Cited by 148Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMedication Adherence and CompliancePharmaceutical studies and practices

Determinants of adherence to methylphenidate and the impact of poor adherence on maternal and family measures

Gau, Susan S.F., Shen, Hsin-Yi, Chou, Miao-Churn, Tang, Ching-Shu, Chiu, Yen-Nan, Gau, Churn-Shiouh·2006·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the association between adherence to immediate-release methylphenidate (IR MPH) and maternal psychological distress, parenting style, parent- child relationship, and perceived family support. METHODS: The sample consisted of 307 children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (271 boys and 36 girls), 6-17 years of age, who had been treated with IR MPH for the past 6 months. The measures included the Chinese Health Questionnaire, Parental Bonding Instrument, Family APGAR, and Home Behaviors of the Social Adjustment Inventory for Children and Adolescents. RESULTS: Reasons for poor adherence (n = 79; 25.7%) included forgetting medication (72.7%), the medication having no effect (20.0%), and refusing medication (12.7%). Increased age and three-times-daily administration were the major predictors for poor adherence to IR MPH. Poor adherence was associated with increased degree of maternal psychological distress, indifferent parenting, maternal overprotection/control, poor family support, decreased interaction with parents, and increased problems at home. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that multiple daily dosing of MPH increases the likelihood of poor adherence, particularly in adolescents, and that poor adherence is associated with impaired maternal/family process. Once-daily administration of MPH is necessary to improve adherence and to decrease the possible exacerbation of tense parent-child relationships caused by poor drug adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2006.16.286

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gau, S. S. F., Shen, H.-Y., Chou, M.-C., Tang, C.-S., Chiu, Y.-N., & Gau, C.-S.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Department of Child Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-06
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
286-297
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W2030460171
Cited by
148
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
methylphenidate, medication adherence, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, maternal distress, parenting styles, parent-child relationship, family support, multiple daily dosing, adolescents, reasons for non-adherence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Parent-Child Relations, Patient Compliance, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review