Cited by 46Psychiatric care and mental health servicesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Piloting of COPES: An Empirically Informed Psychosocial Intervention on an Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Unit

Wolff, Jennifer C., Frazier, Elisabeth A., Weatherall, Sarah L., Thompson, Alysha D., Liu, Richard T., Hunt, Jeffrey I.·2018·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the feasibility and initial efficacy of an empirically informed psychosocial intervention on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. METHODS: Data were obtained for 463 adolescents 12-16 years of age on a psychiatric inpatient unit. Information collected included demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, length of inpatient stay, completion of four treatment modules, rehospitalizations, and emergency room visits during 12 months after discharge from index admission. RESULTS: Around 98.70% of patients completed at least one out of the four treatment modules and 93.95% of patients completed two modules. There were no significant barriers to completing treatment modules on the basis of participant characteristics (demographics, psychiatric diagnosis, number of diagnoses, or length of stay). Completion of the four treatment modules, particularly modules on developing a safety plan and enhancing life, predicted lower risk for rehospitalization and emergency room contact in the 12 months postdischarge. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the intervention is feasible to implement regardless of common barriers in an inpatient psychiatric setting, such as complex psychopathology and brief duration of hospitalization. Completion of treatment modules significantly reduces risk for subsequent emergency intensive service utilization, suggesting this intervention may be an effective method for reducing acute clinical events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2017.0135

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolff, J. C., Frazier, E. A., Weatherall, S. L., Thompson, A. D., Liu, R. T., & Hunt, J. I.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Wolff, Jennifer C.
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2018-08
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
409-414
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W2796952506
Cited by
46
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
adolescent psychiatric inpatients, psychosocial interventions, feasibility, hospital readmission, emergency department visits, safety planning, treatment completion, post-discharge outcomes
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Department, Hospital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review