Cited by 151Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychiatric care and mental health services

Treatment for adolescents following a suicide attempt: results of a pilot trial

Donaldson, Deidre, Spirito, Anthony, Esposito-Smythers, Christianne·2005·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of a skills-based treatment protocol to a supportive relationship therapy for adolescents after a suicide attempt.Method Thirty-nine adolescents (12-17 years old) and parents who presented to a general pediatric emergency department or inpatient unit of a child psychiatric hospital after a suicide attempt were randomized to either a skills-based or a supportive relationship treatment condition. Follow-up assessments were conducted at intake and 3 and 6 months post-attempt.Results In contrast to the low rates of treatment received by adolescent suicide attempters in the community, approximately 60% of this sample completed the entire treatment protocol. Significant decreases in suicidal ideation and depressed mood at 3- and 6-month follow-ups were obtained, but there were no differences between treatment groups. There were six reattempts in the follow-up period.Conclusions When adolescents who attempt suicide are maintained in treatment, significant improvements in functioning can be realized for the majority of patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200502000-00003

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the seven trials that recorded treatment adherence, it was measured in various ways, including the proportion completing the full treatment course and the proportion attending the first appointment.

    “In the seven trials that recorded information on treatment adherence, this was assessed using a variety of methods including: the proportion of participants that completed the full course of treatment (Donaldson 2005; Harrington 1998; Rossouw 2012a), the proportion attending their first appointment ( Ougrin 2011a)”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Donaldson 2005

  • In a single trial comparing brief psychological therapy (problem-solving and affect management) with supportive relationship therapy, no beneficial effects were found for repetition of self-harm, treatment adherence, depression, or suicidal ideation.

    “In a single trial of brief psychological therapy consisting of problem-solving and affect management training skills compared with supportive relationship therapy (Donaldson 2005), no beneficial effects of the psychological therapy were found in terms of repetition of SH, treatment adherence, depression, and suicidal ideation.”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Donaldson 2005

  • Two trials had unclear risk of bias for allocation concealment because no details were provided.

    “We rated two trials as having an unclear risk of bias for this item as no details on allocation concealment were provided (Donaldson 2005; Spirito 2002)”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Donaldson 2005

  • The other three trials were rated unclear risk for blinding of outcome assessors because no information was provided.

    “We rated the remaining three trials, however, as having an unclear risk of bias for this item as no information on blinding of outcome assessors was provided (Cotgrove 1995;Donaldson 2005;Spirito 2002).”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Donaldson 2005

  • The remaining trial was rated unclear risk of bias for participant blinding because no information was given, though the treatments were similar enough that blinding remained possible (Donaldson 2005).

    “We rated the remaining trial as having an unclear risk of bias for this item as, although no information on participant blinding was provided, both treatments were so similar it remains possible that participants may have been blind to treatment allocation (Donaldson 2005).”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Donaldson 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donaldson, D., Spirito, A., & Esposito-Smythers, C.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Donaldson, Deidre
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
113-120
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981377458
Cited by
151
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r03mh057349-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH057349)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
adolescent suicide attempts, suicide attempters, suicidal ideation, depressive mood, repeated suicide attempts, treatment retention, post-acute care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Depressive Disorder, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Admission, Pilot Projects, Problem Solving, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review