Cited by 35Obesity, Physical Activity, DietDiverse Educational Innovations StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Cooking and Gardening Behaviors and Improvements in Dietary Intake in Hispanic/Latino Youth

Open access
Landry, Matthew J., Markowitz, Annie K., Asigbee, Fiona M., Gatto, Nicole M., Spruijt-Metz, Donna, Davis, Jaimie N.·2019·Childhood Obesity

Abstract

Background: School gardening interventions typically include cooking and gardening (CG) components; however, few studies have examined associations between CG psychosocial behaviors (attitudes, self-efficacy, and motivation), dietary intake, and obesity parameters. This study assessed the association between changes in CG behaviors with changes in dietary intake and obesity in participants of the LA Sprouts study, an after-school, 12-week, randomized controlled CG intervention conducted in four inner-city elementary schools in Los Angeles. Methods: Process analysis using data from 290 low-income, primarily Hispanic/Latino third through fifth-grade students who were randomized to either the LA Sprouts intervention (n = 160) or control group (n = 130). Height, weight, waist circumference, dietary intake via questionnaire, and CG behaviors were collected at baseline and postintervention. Linear regressions determined whether changes in CG behaviors predicted changes in dietary intake and obesity outcomes. Results: There were no differences in changes in CG psychosocial behaviors between intervention and control groups, therefore groups were combined. Participants were 49% male, 87% Hispanic/Latino, and an average age of nine. Increases in cooking behaviors significantly predicted increases in dietary fiber intake (p = 0.004) and increases in vegetable intake (p = 0.03). Increases in gardening behaviors significantly predicted increased intake of dietary fiber (p = 0.02). Changes in CG behaviors were not associated with changes in BMI z-score or waist circumference. Conclusions: Results from this study suggest that school-based interventions should incorporate CG components, despite their potentially costly and time-intensive nature, as these behaviors may be responsible for improvements in dietary intake of high-risk minority youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/chi.2018.0110

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intervention durations varied: nine studies lasted not longer than three months, four lasted 4-6 months, and eight lasted 7-12 months.

    “Intervention durations varied, with nine studies lasting not longer than three months [45–50, 53, 57, 62], four studies lasting 4–6 months [43, 55, 56, 58], and eight studies lasting 7–12 months [44, 51, 52, 54, 59, 61, 63, 64].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [50]

    The paper describes LA Sprouts as a 12-week intervention (section C; page unavailable), supporting its inclusion among studies lasting no longer than three months. It does not provide the claimed counts of studies in each duration category or establish the durations of the other studies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Behavioral and decision-oriented components were common in included interventions and included food choice, planning, goal-setting, portion awareness, self-efficacy, intention formation, and family or peer reinforcement.

    “Behavioral and decision-oriented components were likewise common and included food choice, planning, goal-setting, portion awareness, self-efficacy, intention formation, and family or peer reinforcement [43, 44, 46, 47, 50, 52–56, 61–63].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Description of the LA Sprouts Intervention describes cooking, nutrition lessons, and planning and planting a garden; the Discussion examines cooking and gardening self-efficacy and motivation. These passages support some behavioral and decision-oriented components, but do not establish goal-setting, portion awareness, intention formation, or family or peer reinforcement as components of this intervention. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nutrition education covering definitions, food groups, and nutrient functions was included in 20 intervention programs.

    “Nutrition education—covering definitions, food groups, and nutrient functions—was included in 20 intervention programs [43–59, 62–64].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Description of the LA Sprouts Intervention (page not provided) says this program included a nutrition curriculum covering dietary fiber and the benefits of fruits and vegetables. It does not establish that the curriculum covered definitions or food groups, or that 20 programs included such education; the count belongs to the citing sentence’s group of references, not this paper alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Children in included cooking interventions prepared simple dishes rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, often eating together afterwards.

    “Children prepared simple dishes rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, often eating together afterwards [45, 48, 50].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Description of the LA Sprouts Intervention (page unavailable) says students prepared recipes featuring fruit and/or vegetables in small groups and then ate the dishes together. It does not say the dishes were simple or contained whole grains, and it describes one intervention rather than cooking interventions generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Gardening and farm visits extended experiential activities in included interventions, engaging pupils in planting, growing, harvesting, and composting, while linking these activities back to cooking and shared meals.

    “Gardening and farm visits further extended these experiences, engaging pupils in planting, growing, harvesting, and composting, while linking these activities back to cooking and shared meals [47, 50].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Description of the LA Sprouts Intervention (page not provided) describes pupils planting, growing, and harvesting produce, learning about composting, preparing recipes, and eating the dishes together. It places these activities in school gardens, not on farm visits; our copy does not support that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]44. Hunsberger M, O'Malley J, Block T, Norris JC. Relative valida- tion of Block Kids Food Screener for dietary assessment in chil- dren and adolescents. Matern Child Nutr 2015;11:260-270.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landry, M. J., Markowitz, A. K., Asigbee, F. M., Gatto, N. M., Spruijt-Metz, D., & Davis, J. N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Claremont Graduate University (US)
  • Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Corresponding author
Davis, Jaimie N.
Venue
Childhood Obesity
Published
2019-06
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
262-270
ISSN
  • 2153-2168 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-2176
OpenAlex
W2938051965
Cited by
35
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Childhood Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21DK094066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
school-based intervention, dietary intake, Hispanic/Latino youth, dietary fiber, vegetable consumption, psychosocial behavior, self-efficacy, motivation, attitudes, after-school programs, low-income children
MeSH terms
Child, Cooking, Diet, Female, Health Promotion, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Los Angeles, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy, Gardening, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review