The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pairwise Alignment of Protein Interaction Networks
Abstract
With an ever-increasing amount of available data on protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and research revealing that these networks evolve at a modular level, discovery of conserved patterns in these networks becomes an important problem. Although available data on protein-protein interactions is currently limited, recently developed algorithms have been shown to convey novel biological insights through employment of elegant mathematical models. The main challenge in aligning PPI networks is to define a graph theoretical measure of similarity between graph structures that captures underlying biological phenomena accurately. In this respect, modeling of conservation and divergence of interactions, as well as the interpretation of resulting alignments, are important design parameters. In this paper, we develop a framework for comprehensive alignment of PPI networks, which is inspired by duplication/divergence models that focus on understanding the evolution of protein interactions. We propose a mathematical model that extends the concepts of match, mismatch, and gap in sequence alignment to that of match, mismatch, and duplication in network alignment and evaluates similarity between graph structures through a scoring function that accounts for evolutionary events. By relying on evolutionary models, the proposed framework facilitates interpretation of resulting alignments in terms of not only conservation but also divergence of modularity in PPI networks. Furthermore, as in the case of sequence alignment, our model allows flexibility in adjusting parameters to quantify underlying evolutionary relationships. Based on the proposed model, we formulate PPI network alignment as an optimization problem and present fast algorithms to solve this problem. Detailed experimental results from an implementation of the proposed framework show that our algorithm is able to discover conserved interaction patterns very effectively, in terms of both accuracies and computational cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Identification of common molecular subsequences
Smith, T. F., & Waterman, M. S. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(81)90087-5 · Cited by 9,940
Massagué, J. (1998) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.753 · Cited by 7,556
An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks
Bader, G. D., & Hogue, C. W. (2003) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-2 · Cited by 6,072
An Efficient Heuristic Procedure for Partitioning Graphs
Kernighan, B. W., & Lin, S. (1970) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb01770.x · Cited by 5,305
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes
Gavin, A.-C., Bösche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J. M., Michon, A.-M., Cruciat, C.-M., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415141a · Cited by 4,759
The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution
Tatusov, R. L. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.33 · Cited by 4,520
From molecular to modular cell biology.
Hartwell, L. H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler, S., & Murray, A. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35011540 · Cited by 3,632
Cited by
Protein-to-protein interactions: Technologies, databases, and algorithms
Cannataro, M., Guzzi, P. H., & Veltri, P. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1824795.1824796 · Cited by 620
Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks
Mitra, K., Carvunis, A.-R., Ramesh, S. K., & Ideker, T. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3552 · Cited by 535
Topological network alignment uncovers biological function and phylogeny
Kuchaiev, O., Milenković, T., Memišević, V., Hayes, W., & Pržulj, N. (2010) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2010.0063 · Cited by 355
A Guide to Conquer the Biological Network Era Using Graph Theory
Koutrouli, M., Karatzas, E., Paez-Espino, D., & Pavlopoulos, G. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00034 · Cited by 264
Integrative network alignment reveals large regions of global network similarity in yeast and human
Kuchaiev, O., & Pržulj, N. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr127 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Koyutürk, M., Kim, Y., Topkara, U., Subramaniam, S., Szpankowski, W., & Grama, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-199
- ISSN
- 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8666
- OpenAlex
- W1984209790
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pairwise Alignment of Protein Interaction Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/cmb.2006.13.182
- The paper
- Koyutürk, M., Kim, Y., Topkara, U., Subramaniam, S., Szpankowski, W., & Grama, A. (2006). Pairwise Alignment of Protein Interaction Networks. Journal of Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2006.13.182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.