CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 696Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information Disclosure and Control on Facebook: Are They Two Sides of the Same Coin or Two Different Processes?

Christofides, Emily, Muise, Amy, Desmarais, Serge·2009·CyberPsychology & Behavior
DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0226
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Facebook, the popular social network site, is changing the nature of privacy and the consequences of information disclosure. Despite recent media reports regarding the negative consequences of disclosing information on social network sites such as Facebook, students are generally thought to be unconcerned about the potential costs of this disclosure. The current study explored undergraduate students' information disclosure and information control on Facebook and the personality factors that influence levels of disclosure and control. Participants in this online survey were 343 undergraduate students who were current users of Facebook. Results indicated that participants perceived that they disclosed more information about themselves on Facebook than in general, but participants also reported that information control and privacy were important to them. Participants were very likely to have posted information such as their birthday and e-mail address, and almost all had joined an online network. They were also very likely to post pictures such as a profile picture, pictures with friends, and even pictures at parties and drinking with friends. Contrary to expectations, information disclosure and information control were not significantly negatively correlated, and multiple regression analyses revealed that while disclosure was significantly predicted by the need for popularity, levels of trust and self-esteem predicted information control. Therefore, disclosure and control on Facebook are not as closely related as expected but rather are different processes that are affected by different aspects of personality. Implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2008.0226

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Klaassen A, 2007, Advertising Age, 78, 14
  2. Ellison NB, 2007, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12
  3. Gangadharbatla H, 2008, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18
  4. Goldner KR, 2008, Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: Sciences & Engineering, 68, 7708

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 691

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
ORCID
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2009-06
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
341-345
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
DOI
10.1089/cpb.2008.0226
OpenAlex
W2046435680
Cited by
696
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 59
FWCI
133.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/ (tdm)
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
Facebook, information disclosure, information control, privacy, social network sites, undergraduate students, trust, self-esteem, personality factors, online privacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Self Disclosure, Social Desirability, Social Identification, Social Support, Software Design, Students, Privacy, Internet, Friends, Trust, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review