The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Online Brand Community Type on Consumer's Community Engagement Behaviors: Consumer-Created vs. Marketer-Created Online Brand Community in Online Social-Networking Web Sites
Abstract
The current study proposed and tested a theoretical model of consumers' online brand community engagement behaviors, with particular attention given to online brand community type (consumer vs. marketer-created). By integrating attribution and social identity theories, this study investigated the causal linkages between intrinsic motives of altruism, social identification motivations, and online brand community engagement behaviors. The results showed that consumers' online brand community engagement intentions were indirectly influenced by the different types of communities through different levels of consumers' attributions to intrinsic motives of altruism. This study also found that, in the attribution processes, consumers' intrinsic motives of altruism motivated them to identify themselves socially with the online communities they join. Finally, this study demonstrated that the intrinsic motives of altruism and social identification motivations provided strong social incentives to motivate consumers to engage in subsequent online brand community behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025
Cited by
Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources
Shareef, M. A., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Islam, R. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.001 · Cited by 587
Tsai, W.-H. S., & Men, L. R. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.942678 · Cited by 233
Engaging with consumers using social media: a case study of music festivals
Hudson, S., & Hudson, R. (2013) · International Journal of Event and Festival Management · doi:10.1108/ijefm-06-2013-0012 · Cited by 128
Motivational Drivers of Content Contribution to Company‐ Versus Consumer‐Hosted Online Communities
Teichmann, K., Stokburger‐Sauer, N. E., Plank, A., & Strobl, A. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20783 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, D., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. K.
- Venue
- Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 59-63
- ISSN
- 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 2152-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2110416264
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Online Brand Community Type on Consumer's Community Engagement Behaviors: Consumer-Created vs. Marketer-Created Online Brand Community in Online Social-Networking Web Sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/cyber.2009.0397
- The paper
- Lee, D., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. K. (2011). The Impact of Online Brand Community Type on Consumer's Community Engagement Behaviors: Consumer-Created vs. Marketer-Created Online Brand Community in Online Social-Networking Web Sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.