Cited by 164Media Influence and HealthMedia and Digital CommunicationImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Following Your “Friend”: Social Media and the Strength of Adolescents' Parasocial Relationships with Media Personae

Bond, Bradley J.·2016·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

Social media have permeated the lives of adolescents and may be altering the way that teens engage with their favorite media celebrities and characters. This study surveyed 316 adolescents to examine the relationship between social media surveillance and the strength of adolescents' parasocial relationships (PSRs) with media personae they follow on social media. Results indicated a significant positive relationship between exposure to media personae on Twitter and strength of PSRs. Adolescents who had experienced social interactions with their favorite media personae on Twitter in the form of retweets or responses to tweets had stronger PSRs than adolescents who had no such interactions. The realism of the media personae did not moderate findings as expected. The findings suggest that Twitter provides intimate glimpses into the personal lives of media personae that increase audiences' feelings of connectedness to those celebrities and characters, an important finding given that teens are more likely to learn from media personae with whom they have PSRs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2016.0355

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bond, B. J.
Affiliations
University of San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Bond, Bradley J.
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2016-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
656-660
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2533394122
Cited by
162
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
62.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
parasocial relationships, adolescents, social media, Twitter, celebrity, retweets, perceived realism, connectedness, social media surveillance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Famous Persons, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review