Cited by 111Digital Marketing and Social MediaMarketing and Advertising StrategiesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Friend-zone with benefits: the parasocial advertising of Kim Kardashian

Open access
Lueck, Jennifer Anette·2015·Journal of Marketing Communications

Abstract

This research focuses on the social-media-driven convention of advertising, and seeks to analyze the type of communication that occurs between celebrity endorsers and audiences within social media. Kim Kardashian is the most current and successful celebrity endorser. A content analysis including posts and responses from April and May 2011 is used to analyze the type of advertising messages and celebrity/audience interaction. The goal of the study is to establish whether Parasocial Interaction could improve the effectiveness of advertising. Due to findings that yielded a high amount of endorsements embedded into personal stories, as well as female approval for those posts, it can be stated that Parasocial Interaction takes place between the celebrity and audiences. It can also be considered as an advertising vehicle, in terms of positive audience feedback. The results imply that advertisers should utilize Parasocial Interaction to conduct successful advertising.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13527266.2012.726235

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nielsen Online. (2009). Retrieved from http://nielsen.com/us/en/insights/press- room/2009/social_networks_.html. "Parasocial relationships and Twitter." Retrieved from http://jussipekkaerkkola.posterous.com/parasocial-relationships-and-twitter.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lueck, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Lueck, Jennifer Anette
Venue
Journal of Marketing Communications
Published
2012-10-05
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
91-109
ISSN
  • 1352-7266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4445
OpenAlex
W2073108978
Cited by
111
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing Communications (publishedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
parasocial interaction, celebrity endorsement, Kim Kardashian, social media advertising, advertising effectiveness, audience feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review