Cited by 37Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Impact of Modem-Transferred Blood Glucose Data on Clinician Work Efficiency and Patient Glycemic Control

Bergenstal, Richard M., Anderson, Robyn L., Bina, Dawn M., Johnson, Mary L., Davidson, Janet L., Solarz-Johnson, Brenda, Kendall, David M.·2005·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication of blood glucose (BG) results between patients and health care providers (HCPs) is of established benefit and remains a critical part of the diabetes management process. Currently, HCPs typically receive BG data from patients at the time of clinic visits or by telephone. The Accu-Chek Acculink modem (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN) provides an additional and attractive option that can potentially facilitate this communication. METHODS: To assess the impact of modem transfer of BG, we studied 47 participants with diabetes enrolled in a diabetes education program. Subjects were randomized to weekly communication of BG data to their HCP by either telephone (n = 23) or modem (n = 24) for 4 weeks. Mean age (+/- SD) was 44 +/- 15 years, 62% were female, 74% used insulin, 53% had type 1 diabetes, and mean baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) was 8.8% (range 5.2-13.2%). RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in the amount of time the HCP spent analyzing BG data and communicating with patients (12.6 +/- 6.1 min/week in the telephone group and 11.5 +/- 5.1 min/week in the modem group) or in the number of patient and HCP attempts needed to make contact. There were similar improvements in A1C between groups (change of -0.4 +/- 0.7% in the telephone group and -0.9 +/- 1.4% in the modem group, P = 0.18). BG data provided by telephone had a 6% error rate, in contrast to modem-sent data, which were transmitted without error. CONCLUSIONS: Modem transfer of BG data can provide an accurate and clinically useful option for communication between patients and their HCP and has comparable effects on A1C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2005.7.241

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergenstal, R. M., Anderson, R. L., Bina, D. M., Johnson, M. L., Davidson, J. L., Solarz-Johnson, B., & Kendall, D. M.
Affiliations
International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2005-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
241-247
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2070959258
Cited by
37
References
9
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Roche Diagnostics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
blood glucose monitoring, telephone communication, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes management, patient-clinician communication, diabetes education, insulin users, type 1 diabetes
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Modems, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Efficiency, Female, Health Education, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Nurses, Physicians, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Reproducibility of Results, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review