Cited by 39Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Does nutritional counseling in telemedicine improve treatment outcomes for diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of results from 92 studies

Su, Dejun, McBride, Chelsea, Zhou, Junmin, Kelley, Megan S·2016·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Background: A growing number of studies and reviews have documented the impact of telemedicine on diabetes management. However, no meta-analysis has assessed whether including nutritional counseling as part of a telemedicine program has a significant impact on diabetes outcomes or what kind of nutritional counseling is most effective. Methods: Original research articles examining the effect of telemedicine interventions on HbA1c levels in patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes were included in this study. A literature search was performed and 92 studies were retained for analysis. We examined stratified results by differentiating interventions using no nutritional counseling from those that used nutritional counseling. We further compared between nutritional counseling administered via short message systems (SMS) such as email and text messages, and nutritional counseling administered via telephone or videoconference. Results: Telemedicine programs that include a nutritional component show similar effect in diabetes management as those programs that do not. Furthermore, subgroup analysis reveals that nutritional intervention via SMS such as email and text messages is at least as equally effective in reducing HbA1c when compared to personal nutritional counseling with a practitioner over videoconference or telephone. Conclusion: The inclusion of nutritional counseling as part of a telemedicine program does not make a significant difference to diabetes outcomes. Incorporating nutritional counseling into telemedicine programs via SMS is at least as effective as counseling via telephone or videoconference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x15608297

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, D., McBride, C., Zhou, J., & Kelley, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
McBride, Chelsea
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2016-07-10
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
333-347
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W1862131840
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
telemedicine, nutrition counseling, diabetes management, HbA1c, glycemic control, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, text messaging, email, telephone counseling
MeSH terms
Counseling, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review