Lower Rate of Initial Failures and Reduced Occurrence of Adverse Events with a New Catheter Model for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Prospective, Two-Period, Observational, Multicenter Study
Abstract
Background: No recent clinical data on the incidence of catheter-related adverse events under insulin pump therapy have been reported. Methods: This was a prospective, two-period, observational, multicenter study in 45 diabetes outpatients (mean continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII] use, 6 years; mean hemoglobin A1c, 7.7%, at baseline). During the initial 1-month period (P1), the patients used their current catheter model, including a soft cannula in 98% of cases. They moved then to the new Accu-Chek ® FlexLink catheter model (Disetronic Medical Systems AG, Burgdorf, Switzerland) for a 3-month period. The primary end point, including insertion failures and unexplained hyperglycemia within the first 6 h after catheter placement, was assessed from logbook records during P1 and the last month of the second period (P2). Secondary end points were catheter replacements for unexplained hyperglycemia and/or events at risk for immediate insulin delivery failure after the first 6 h. Results: Forty-five initial infusion failures occurred in 14 patients among 507 catheter insertions (8.9% of cases) during P1, whereas 15 similar events were seen in nine patients during P2 among 488 catheter insertions (3.1% of cases) ( P < 0.001). Catheters were replaced for later infusion troubles in 8% of cases during both P1 and P2. The overall rate of late cumulative events was, however, 113 of 507 (P1) versus 66 of 488 (P2) ( P < 0.001). The occurrence of pain, skin reaction, or redness at the infusion site was lower during P2. Conclusion: Incidences both of initial failures and of premature catheter replacements were 8–9% with current CSII catheters. Significantly reduced failures after insertion and adverse events at the infusion site were observed with the new catheter model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Silent occlusions contribute to the occurrence of unexplained hyperglycemia and glycemic variability in patients using CSII.
“Based on our findings as well as previous reports,15,16,18 we believe that silent occlusions contribute to the occurrence of unexplained hyperglycemia and glycemic variability in patients using CSII.”
From Reduced Silent Occlusions with a Novel Catheter Infusion Set (BD FlowSmart): Results from Two Open-Label Comparative Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
A 15% failure rate of polymer catheters over the 8-h period following insertion was observed by Patel et al., and nearly 9% of soft cannula insertions failed within a 6-h period by Renard et al.
“Furthermore, a 15% failure rate of polymer catheters (blood glucose value of >250 mg/dL and not decreasing at least 50 mg in 1 h post–correction bolus) over the 8-h period following insertion was observed by Patel et al.15 and in nearly 9% of soft cannula insertions within a 6-h period by Renard et al,16 suggesting that existing polymer catheters have a tendency to fail upon insertion.”
From Reduced Silent Occlusions with a Novel Catheter Infusion Set (BD FlowSmart): Results from Two Open-Label Comparative Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
Other limitations include the use of trained nurses to manage insertions, relatively short duration of infusions, and limited ambulatory activities, which might not reflect the true prevalence of pressure-related or leakage events.
“Other limitations, including the use of trained nurses to manage insertions rather than the subject, relatively short duration of infusions, and limited ambulatory activities by subjects, might not reflect the true prevalence of pressure-related or leakage events and unexplained hyperglycemia as reported by others9,16 but are inherent to the nature of the investigations performed.”
From Reduced Silent Occlusions with a Novel Catheter Infusion Set (BD FlowSmart): Results from Two Open-Label Comparative Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Pancreas: Past, Present, Future
Cobelli, C., Renard, E., & Kovatchev, B. (2011) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db11-0654 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Self-citationNew insulin delivery recommendations
Frid, A. H., Kreugel, G., Grassi, G., Halimi, S., Hicks, D., Hirsch, L. J., Smith, M. J., Wellhoener, R., Bode, B. W., Hirsch, I. B., et al. (2016) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.010 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Insulin Infusion Set: The Achilles Heel of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
Heinemann, L., & Krinelke, L. (2012) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681200600429 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Randomized Trial of Infusion Set Function: Steel Versus Teflon
Patel, P. J., Benasi, K., Ferrari, G., Evans, M. G., Shanmugham, S., Wilson, D. M., & Buckingham, B. A. (2014) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0119 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Insulin pump-associated adverse events in children and adolescents–a prospective study
Wheeler, B. J., Heels, K., Donaghue, K. C., Reith, D. M., & Ambler, G. R. (2014) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0388 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Insulin Infusion Set Use: European Perspectives and Recommendations
Deiss, D., Adolfsson, P., Alkemade-van Zomeren, M., Bolli, G. B., Charpentier, G., Cobelli, C., Danne, T., Girelli, A., Mueller, H., Verderese, C. A., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2016.07281.sf · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Gibney, M., Xue, Z., Swinney, M., Bialonczyk, D., & Hirsch, L. (2016) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2015.0342 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Renard, E., Guerci, B., Leguerrier, A.-M., & Boizel, R.
- Affiliations
- Montpellier University Hospital
- Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR)
- Roche (France) (FR)
- ORCID
- Guerci, Bruno
- Venue
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 769-773
- ISSN
- 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8593
- OpenAlex
- W2044197170
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Roche Diabetes Care
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- insulin pump therapy, infusion catheter, catheter-related complications, catheter replacement, type 1 diabetes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Catheterization, Catheters, Indwelling, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Incidence, Cross-Over Studies, Diabetes Complications, Infusions, Subcutaneous, Catheter-Related Infections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review