Cited by 148Diabetes Management and ResearchIntravenous Infusion Technology and SafetyDiabetes Management and Education

Insulin Infusion Set: The Achilles Heel of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion

Open access
Heinemann, Lutz, Krinelke, Lars·2012·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion from an insulin pump depends on reliable transfer of the pumped insulin to the subcutaneous insulin depot by means of an insulin infusion set (IIS). Despite their widespread use, the published knowledge about IISs and related issues regarding the impact of placement and wear time on insulin absorption/insulin action is relatively small. We also have to acknowledge that our knowledge is limited with regard to how often patients encounter issues with IISs. Reading pump wearer blogs, for instance, suggests that these are a frequent source of trouble. There are no prospective clinical studies available on current IIS and insulin formulations that provide representative data on the type and frequency of issues with infusion sets. The introduction of new IISs and patch pumps may foster a reassessment of available products and of patient problems related to their use. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge and recommendations about IISs and to highlight potential directions of IIS development in order to make insulin absorption safer and more efficient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/193229681200600429

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bargero G, 1986, Minerva Med., 77, 1285
  2. Nguyen TV, 1988, Cutis., 41, 355
  3. 10.2337/diacare.12.2.153 · DOI
  4. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 1983, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 32, 404
  5. Nowakowska M, 2007, Pol J Microbiol., 56, 239

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinemann, L., & Krinelke, L.
Affiliations
  • Science & Co, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Roche (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Heinemann, Lutz
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2012-07
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
954-964
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098427407
Cited by
148
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
insulin pump therapy, insulin pump, insulin absorption, insulin action, insulin formulations, diabetes technology
MeSH terms
Achilles Tendon, Diabetes Mellitus, Disinfection, Heel, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Mythology, Needles, Patient Education as Topic, Infusions, Subcutaneous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review