Cited by 95Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Real-world assessments of mySugr mobile health app

Open access
Debong, Fredrick, Mayer, Harald, Kober, Johanna·2019·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) solutions such as diabetes self-management apps improve glycated hemoglobin, particularly those that provide a feedback loop between patient and health care provider. mHealth apps that incorporate behaviorally designed interventions can improve patient access to diabetes self-management education and ongoing support. The mySugr mobile app was designed to support patients in their diabetes self-management. Most studies of mHealth apps were conducted under controlled conditions and did not elucidate the nuances of patient perceptions and utilization of these apps in everyday life. In this article, we discuss findings from real-world observations of changes in glycemic control and patient satisfaction associated with the use of the mySugr mHealth app.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2019.0019

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mySugr observed improvements in mean blood glucose (−10.4%), tests in range (+8.5%), and estimated HbA1c (eA1c) (−0.4%) over two months by enhancing adherence to self-monitoring practices.

    “mySugr observed improvements in mean blood glucose (−10.4%), tests in range (+8.5%), and estimated HbA1c (eA1c) (−0.4%) over two months by enhancing adherence to self-monitoring practices (32).”

    From Personalized nutrition in type 2 diabetes remission: application of digital twin technology for predictive glycemic control (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Recent analyses section reports the three stated improvements between baseline and two months after mySugr Bundle initiation. It also reports increased monitoring frequency, but compares different time points and does not establish that improved adherence to self-monitoring caused the glycemic improvements. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Grohmann-Izay B, Forisch M: Use of digital tracking de- vices in the management of diabetes mellitus: a systemic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. Diabetes 2015; 64(Suppl. 1):137-LB.
  2. Hompesch M, Hergesheimer L, Kalcher K, et al.: Retro- spective analysis of Impact on SMBG and glycemic control of mobile health (mHealth)-application for diabetes man- agement. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017;11:A31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Debong, F., Mayer, H., & Kober, J.
Affiliations
  • hi.health, Vienna, Austria.
  • mySugr GmbH, Vienna Austria.
Corresponding author
Mayer, Harald
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2019-05-23
Volume
21
Issue
2_suppl
Pages
S235-S240
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2950567362
Cited by
95
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
mobile health apps, diabetes self-management, glycemic control, HbA1c, patient satisfaction, diabetes self-management education
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications, Patient Outcome Assessment, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review