Cited by 49Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationInnovation in Digital Healthcare Systems

A Nudge-Inspired AI-Driven Health Platform for Self-Management of Diabetes

Open access
Joachim, Shane, Forkan, Abdur Rahim Mohammad, Jayaraman, Prem Prakash, Morshed, Ahsan, Wickramasinghe, Nilmini·2022·Sensors

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a serious chronic disease that affects the blood sugar levels in individuals, with current predictions estimating that nearly 578 million people will be affected by diabetes by 2030. Patients with type II diabetes usually follow a self-management regime as directed by a clinician to help regulate their blood glucose levels. Today, various technology solutions exist to support self-management; however, these solutions tend to be independently built, with little to no research or clinical grounding, which has resulted in poor uptake. In this paper, we propose, develop, and implement a nudge-inspired artificial intelligence (AI)-driven health platform for self-management of diabetes. The proposed platform has been co-designed with patients and clinicians, using the adapted 4-cycle design science research methodology (A4C-DSRM) model. The platform includes (a) a cross-platform mobile application for patients that incorporates a macronutrient detection algorithm for meal recognition and nudge-inspired meal logger, and (b) a web-based application for the clinician to support the self-management regime of patients. Further, the platform incorporates behavioral intervention techniques stemming from nudge theory that aim to support and encourage a sustained change in patient lifestyle. Application of the platform has been demonstrated through an illustrative case study via two exemplars. Further, a technical evaluation is conducted to understand the performance of the MDA to meet the personalization requirements of patients with type II diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22124620

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using artificial intelligence to perform tasks currently handled by NPs, such as sending personalized feedback, reminders to submit BP records, nudging patients to take medications, and scheduling appointments for elevated BP, can improve patient adherence and compliance in remote monitoring.

    “For example, using artificial intelligence (AI) to perform tasks currently handled by NPs,29 such as sending personalized feedback, reminders to submit BP records, nudging patients to take medications, and scheduling appointments for elevated BP, can improve patient adherence and compliance in remote monitoring.30”

    From Program cost and return on investment analysis of remote patient monitoring for hypertension management in the cardiology department of a large healthcare system (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [26]Burke R. Knowledge-Based Recommender Systems Encyclopedia of Library and Information Systems Routledge Oxfordshire, UK 2000 Volume 69
  2. [27]Zhang S. Yao L. Sun A. Tay Y. Deep Learning Based Recommender System: A Survey and New Perspectives ACM Comput. Surv. 2019 52 5 10.1145/3285029 · DOI
  3. [37]Rabbi M. Aung M. Zhang M. Choudhury T. Mybehavior: Automatic Personalized Health Feedback from User Behaviors and Preferences Using Smartphones Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Osaka, Japan 7–11 September 2015 707 718
  4. [44]Thaler R. Sunstein C.R. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness Yale University Press New Haven, CT, USA 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joachim, S., Forkan, A. R. M., Jayaraman, P. P., Morshed, A., & Wickramasinghe, N.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
Corresponding author
Joachim, Shane
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-06-19
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
4620
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283159605
Cited by
49
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, nudge theory, artificial intelligence, mobile health apps, behavioral interventions, blood glucose regulation, personalized nutrition
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review