Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
Open accessAbstract
Background: Recently two new tubeless pumps for insulin therapy were introduced. They were tested for accuracy and occlusion detection and compared with the established patch pump Omnipod ® (OP). Methods: Using a modified setup for tubeless pumps based on IEC 60601-2-24, the basal rate and bolus delivery of the Accu-Chek ® Solo micropump system (ACS) and the A6 TouchCare ® System (A6) were measured with a microgravimetric method. Bolus sizes of 0.2, 1, and 10 U, and basal rates of 0.1 and 1 U/h were evaluated in nine repetitions. For each parameter, mean deviation and number of individual boluses or 1-h basal rate windows within ±15% from target were calculated. In addition, occlusion detection time at basal rates of 0.1 and 1 U/h was determined. Results: Mean deviation of boluses of different volumes in the pumps ranged from −3.3% to +4.0% and 40%–100% of individual boluses were within ±15% of the target. During basal rate delivery, 41% to 98% of 1-h windows were within ±15% of the target with a mean deviation between −8.9% and +4.8%. In general, considerable differences between pump models were observed and deviations decreased with increasing doses. In most parameters, ACS was more accurate, and A6 less accurate, than OP. Mean occlusion detection time ranged from ∼3 h to 7.5 h at 1 U/h and was >24 h or absent at 0.1 U/h. Conclusions: In this evaluation, significant differences between the tested tubeless pump models were observed that became most evident when regarding delivery errors over short time and small volumes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prototype's occlusion detection time was similar or better (distinctly shorter) than that of commercially available pumps tested in comparable settings.
“Our study results suggest that the tested pump prototype provides delivery accuracy and occlusion detection that is similar or even better compared to all commercially available pumps tested with a similar experimental approach.”
From Accuracy Evaluation of a Novel Reusable Patch Pump Prototype (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Deviations from target for the prototype were similar or lower compared to other patch pumps currently available on the market tested in a similar experimental setting.
“However, the results of this investigation showed that deviations from target were similar or lower compared to other patch pumps currently available on the market and that have been tested in a similar experimental setting. 7,8”
From Accuracy Evaluation of a Novel Reusable Patch Pump Prototype (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
The prototype's delivery accuracy is similar or even better than that of all commercially available pumps tested in a comparable experimental setting.
“Our study results suggest that the tested pump prototype provides delivery accuracy and occlusion detection that is similar or even better compared to all commercially available pumps tested with a similar experimental approach.”
From Accuracy Evaluation of a Novel Reusable Patch Pump Prototype (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Insulin Pump Occlusions: For Patients Who Have Been Around the (Infusion) Block
Klonoff, D. C., Freckmann, G., & Heinemann, L. (2017) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296817700545 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationOcclusion Detection Time in Insulin Pumps at Two Different Basal Rates
Freckmann, G., Kamecke, U., Waldenmaier, D., Haug, C., & Ziegler, R. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296817750404 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- [2]Adolfsson P, Ziegler R, Hanas R: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: special needs for children. Pediatr Diabetes 2017; 18: 255– 261 28425167
- [3]Cobelli C, Renard E, Kovatchev B: Artificial pancreas: past, present, future. Diabetes 2011; 60: 2672– 2682 22025773 PMC3198099
- [4]Zisser H, Breton M, Dassau E, et al.: Novel methodology to determine the accuracy of the OmniPod insulin pump: a key component of the artificial pancreas system. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011; 5: 1509– 1518 22226273 PMC3262722
- [5]Jahn LG, Capurro JJ, Levy BL: Comparative dose accuracy of durable and patch insulin infusion pumps. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013; 7: 1011– 1020 23911184 PMC3879767
- [6]Borot S, Franc S, Cristante J, et al.: Accuracy of a new patch pump based on a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) compared to other commercially available insulin pumps: results of the first in vitro and in vivo studies. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014; 8: 1133– 1141 25079676 PMC4455475
- [7]Freckmann G, Kamecke U, Waldenmaier D, et al.: Accuracy of bolus and basal rate delivery of different insulin pump systems. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019; 21: 201– 208 30901232 PMC6477586
- [8]Bowen JL, Allender CJ: A comparative pulse accuracy study of two commercially available patch insulin infusion pumps. Eur Endocrinol 2016; 12: 79– 84 29632592 PMC5813446
- [9]Laubner K, Singler E, Straetener J, et al.: Comparative dose accuracy of durable and patch insulin pumps under laboratory conditions. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019; 21: 371– 378 31149838
- [10]Ziegler R, Waldenmaier D, Kamecke U, et al.: Accuracy assessment of bolus and basal rate delivery of different insulin pump systems used in insulin pump therapy of children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2020; 21: 649– 656 32003490
- [11]Girardot S, Jacquemier P, Mousin F, et al.: All insulin pumps are not equivalent: a bench test assessment on several basal rates. Diabetes Technol Ther 2020; 22: 476– 483 32069066
- [12]Heinemann L, Waldenmaier D, Kulzer B, et al.: Patch pumps: are they all the same? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2019; 13: 34– 40 30132698 PMC6313286
- [13]Ginsberg BH: Patch pumps for insulin. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2019; 13: 27– 33 30070604 PMC6313281
- [14]Ulbrich S, Waldenmaier D, Haug C, et al.: Concept and Implementation of a novel patch pump for insulin delivery. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14: 324– 327 31452394 PMC7196855
- [16]Kamecke U, Waldenmaier D, Haug C, et al.: Establishing methods to determine clinically relevant bolus and basal rate delivery accuracy of insulin pumps. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2019; 13: 60– 67 30003823 PMC6313283
- [18]Ramli R, Reddy M, Oliver N: Artificial pancreas: current progress and future outlook in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Drugs 2019; 79: 1089– 1101 31190305
- [19]Weaver KW, Hirsch IB: The hybrid closed-loop system: evolution and practical applications. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018; 20: S216– S223 29873517
- [20]Sherr JL, Buckingham BA, Forlenza GP, et al.: Safety and performance of the Omnipod hybrid closed-loop system in adults, adolescents, and children with type 1 diabetes over 5 days under free-living conditions. Diabetes Technol Ther 2020; 22: 174– 184 31596130 PMC7047109
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Butterfield, R. D., & Sims, N. M. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1109/ojemb.2024.3408092 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Note: the higher error at low flow rates is consistent with the literature on pumps that have a syringe-like insulin reservoir, which can disrupt flow uniformity, especially at low flow rates [24], [25].”
BackgroundAccuracy Evaluation of a Novel Reusable Patch Pump Prototype
Mende, J., Baumstark, A., Waldenmaier, D., Amirouche, A., Barraud, A., Fridez, P., Haug, C., & Freckmann, G. (2023) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968221097997 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ziegler, R., Oliver, N., Waldenmaier, D., Mende, J., Haug, C., & Freckmann, G.
- Affiliations
- Diabetes Clinic for Children and Adolescents, Muenster, Germany.
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Freckmann, Guido
- Venue
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-04-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 350-357
- ISSN
- 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8593
- PMC
- PMC8080918
- OpenAlex
- W3104807919
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2021-09-30)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- insulin pump therapy, occlusion detection
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Insulin, Regular, Human
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review