Cited by 229Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real-World Performance of the MiniMed™ 780G System: First Report of Outcomes from 4120 Users

Open access
Silva, Julien Da, Lepore, Giuseppe, Battelino, Tadej, Arrieta, Arcelia, Castañeda, Javier, Grossman, Benyamin, Shin, John, Cohen, Ohad·2022·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: The MiniMed™ 780G system includes an advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) algorithm that provides both automated basal and correction bolus insulin delivery. The preliminary performance of the system in real-world settings was evaluated. Methods: Data uploaded from August 2020 to March 2021 by individuals living in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Qatar, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom were aggregated and retrospectively analyzed to determine the mean glucose management indicator (GMI), percentage of time spent within (TIR), below (TBR), and above (TAR) glycemic ranges, system use, and insulin consumption in users having ≥10 days of sensor glucose (SG) data after initiating AHCL. The impact of initiating AHCL was evaluated in a subgroup of users also having ≥10 days of SG data, before AHCL initiation. Results: Users ( N = 4120) were observed for a mean of 54 ± 32 days. During this time, they spent a mean of 94.1% ± 11.4% of the time in AHCL and achieved a mean GMI of 6.8% ± 0.3%, TIR of 76.2% ± 9.1%, TBR <70 of 2.5% ± 2.1%, and TAR >180 of 21.3% ± 9.4%, after initiating AHCL. There were 77.3% and 79.0% of users who achieved a TIR >70% and a GMI of <7.0%, respectively. Users for whom comparison with pre-AHCL was possible ( N = 812) reduced their GMI by 0.4% ± 0.4% ( P = 0.005) and increased their TIR by 12.1% ± 10.5% ( P < 0.0001), post-AHCL initiation. More users achieved the glycemic treatment goals of GMI <7.0% (37.6% vs. 75.2%, P < 0.0001) and TIR >70% (34.6% vs. 74.9%, P < 0.0001) when compared with pre-AHCL initiation. Conclusion: Most MiniMed 780G system users achieved TIR >70% and GMI <7%, while minimizing hypoglycemia, in a real-world condition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2021.0203

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Da Silva J, , Arrieta A, , Castaneda J, et al.: Real-world Performance of the MiniMed™ 780G System: impact of initiating automated basal and correction boluses. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23:A79–A80.
  2. Habif S, , Singh H, , Manning M, et al.: Quality of life outcomes and glycemic control from the T:slim X2 Pump with Control-IQ Technology—Real World Observations from the CLIO Study. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23:A-66.
  3. Da Silva J, , Velado K, , Agrawal P, et al.: Real-life use and performance of the MiniMed™ 670G System in Europe. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 22:A96–A97.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Silva, J. D., Lepore, G., Battelino, T., Arrieta, A., Castañeda, J., Grossman, B., Shin, J., & Cohen, O.
Affiliations
  • Medtronic (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
  • Medtronic (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Medtronic, Northridge, California, USA.
  • Medtronic (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Ohad
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2022-01-31
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
113-119
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W3201039184
Cited by
229
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 36
FWCI
30.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
MiniMed 780G, hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery, type 1 diabetes, real-world performance, glucose management indicator, time in range, glycemic control, continuous glucose monitoring
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Retrospective Studies, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review