Cited by 87Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Does Time-in-Range Matter? Perspectives From People With Diabetes on the Success of Current Therapies and the Drivers of Improved Outcomes

Open access
Runge, Ava S., Kennedy, Lynn, Brown, Adam S., Dove, Abigail E., Levine, Brian J., Koontz, Sophie P., Iyengar, Varun S., Odeh, Sarah A. +3 more·2018·Clinical Diabetes

Abstract

IN BRIEF After assessing patient perspectives on the success of current diabetes therapies and the factors that have the greatest impact on daily life, we show that time-in-range is a crucial outcome for people with diabetes and that current therapies are falling short on this metric. We also show that patients feel significant stress and worry, and they believe they are falling short in diet, exercise, and weight maintenance. In addition, they believe diet and exercise and in-range blood glucose are the biggest drivers of improved diabetes management and mindset. Together, these findings support the need for therapies that improve outcomes including and beyond A1C.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/cd17-0094

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Runge, A. S., Kennedy, L., Brown, A. S., Dove, A. E., Levine, B. J., Koontz, S. P., Iyengar, V. S., Odeh, S. A., Close, K. L., Hirsch, I. B., & Wood, R.
Affiliations
  • The diaTribe Foundation, San Francisco, CA
  • Close Concerns (United States) (US)
  • dQ&A Market Research, Inc., San Francisco, CA
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Dove, Abigail E.
Venue
Clinical Diabetes
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
112-119
ISSN
  • 0891-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-4953
OpenAlex
W2780617792
Cited by
87
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
time in range, diabetes management, patient perspectives, glycemic control, HbA1c, patient stress, dietary adherence, physical activity, weight maintenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review