Cited by 21Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Insulin Delivery and Glucose Variability Throughout the Menstrual Cycle on Closed Loop Control for Women with Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Levy, Carol J., O'Malley, Grenye, Raghinaru, Dan, Kudva, Yogish C., Laffel, Lori M., Pinsker, Jordan E., Lum, John W., Brown, Sue A. +78 more·2022·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Objective: To analyze insulin delivery and glycemic metrics throughout the menstrual cycle for women with type 1 diabetes using closed loop control (CLC) insulin delivery. Methods: Menstruating women using a CLC system in a clinical trial were invited to record their menstrual cycles through a cycle-tracking application. Sixteen participants provided data for this secondary analysis over three or more complete cycles. Insulin delivery and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were analyzed in relation to reported cycle phases. Results: Insulin delivery and CGM metrics remained consistent during cycle phases. Intraparticipant variability of CGM metrics and weight-based insulin delivery did not change through cycle phases. Conclusions: For this sample of menstruating women with type 1 diabetes using a CLC system, insulin delivery and glycemic metrics remained stable throughout menstrual cycle phases. Additional studies in this population are needed, particularly among women who report variable glycemic control during their cycles. Trial Registration: NCT03591354.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2021.0431

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies found unchanged glucose metrics across phases of the menstrual cycle in women with type 1 diabetes, checked by CGM or SMBG.

    “two studies [11,21] show unchanged glucose metrics across phases of the MC, checked by CGM or SMBG.”
  • Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review.

    “We included 14 studies published between 1990 and 2022, with sample sizes from 4 to 124 patients.”

    From Menstrual Cycle, Glucose Control and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results describe a substudy of 16 women, not a systematic review. Neither the Results nor the other passages found in our copy state how many studies the citing authors included; the number 14 refers to cycles in a participant range, not studies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]1. Cramer HI: The influence of menstruation on carbohydrate tolerance in diabetes mellitus. Can Med Assoc J 1942;47:51–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]2. Levy CJ, Widom B, Simonson D: Effect of the menstrual cycle on glucose metabolism and diabetes control in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Semin Reprod Med 1994;12:110–118. [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]3. Lunt H, Brown LJ: Self-reported changes in capillary glucose and insulin requirements during the menstrual cycle. Diabet Med 1996;13:525–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]4. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R: Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol 1979;237:E214–E223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [6]6. Yki-Jarvinen H, Koivisto VA: Insulin sensitivity in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetics after ketoacidosis and after three months of insulin therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984;59:371–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [13]13. Brown SA, Raghinaru D, Buckingham B, et al. : 101-LB: eighteen-month use of closed loop control (CLC): a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes 2020;69(Suppl. 1):101-LB. [Google Scholar]
  7. [15]15. Gaete X, Vivanco M, Eyzaguirre FC, et al. : Menstrual cycle irregularities and their relationship with HbA1c and insulin dose in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1822–1826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [16]16. Schroeder B, Hertweck SP, Sanfilippo JS, Foster MB: Correlation between glycemic control and menstruation in diabetic adolescents. J Reprod Med 2000;45:1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Associated Data This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levy, C. J., O'Malley, G., Raghinaru, D., Kudva, Y. C., Laffel, L. M., Pinsker, J. E., Lum, J. W., Brown, S. A., for the iDCL Trial Research Group, Kovatchev, B., Anderson, S., Emory, E., Voelmle, M., Conshafter, K., Morris, K., Oliveri, M., Gondor-Fredrick, L., Mitchell, H., Calvo, K., Wakeman, C., Breton, M., Isganaitis, E., Ambler-Osborn, L., Flint, E., Kim, K., Roethke, L., Mei Church, M., Andre, C., Piper, M., Lam, D., Levister, C., Ogyaadu, S., Lovett, J., Simha, V., Dadlani, V., McCrady-Spitzer, S., Reid, C., Kumari, K., Wadwa, R. P., Forlenza, G., Alonso, G. T., Slover, R., Jost, E., Messer, L., Berget, C., Towers, L., Rossick-Solis, A., Buckingham, B., Ekhlaspour, L., Jacobson, T., Town, M., Tabatabai, I., Keller, J., Salas, E., Doyle, F., Dassau, E., Beck, R., Passman, S., Campos, T., Kollman, C., Murphy, C., Patibandla, N., Borgman, S., Arreaza-Rubin, G., Eggerman, T., Green, N., Kovatchev, B., Anderson, S., Breton, M., Wadwa, R. P., Buckingham, B., Doyle, F., Renard, E., Cobelli, C., Reznik, Y., Arreaza-Rubin, G., Beck, R., Janicek, R., Gabrielson, D., Belle, S. H., Castle, J., Green, J., Legault, L., Willi, S. M., Wysham, C., & Eggerman, T.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Health System (US)
  • Deparment of Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Diseases, Mount Sinai Diabetes Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
  • Sansum Diabetes Research Institute (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Lum, John W.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2022-05
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
357-361
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W4210737221
Cited by
21
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK120358, UC4DK108483, K23DK121942, P30DK036836, P30DK020541)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, menstrual cycle, feedback control, insulin delivery, glycemic variability, continuous glucose monitoring, women, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glucose, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Menstrual Cycle, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Insulin, Regular, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review