Cited by 19Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Insulin Replacement Across the Menstrual Cycle in Women with Type 1 Diabetes: An In Silico Assessment of the Need for Ad Hoc Technology

Diaz C., Jenny L., Fabris, Chiara, Breton, Marc D., Cengiz, Eda·2022·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: Women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) of fertile age may experience fluctuations in insulin needs across the menstrual cycle. When present, these fluctuations complicate glucose management and oftentimes worsen glycemic control. In this work, an in silico analysis was conducted to assess whether current technology is sufficient to handle changes in insulin needs due to the menstrual cycle in women with T1D. Methods: Euglycemic clamp studies were performed in 16 women with T1D in the follicular phase (FP) and luteal phase (LP) of the menstrual cycle. Interphase insulin sensitivity (IS) variability observed in the data was modeled and introduced in the University of Virginia/Padova T1D Simulator. Open-loop and closed-loop insulin delivery was tested in two in silico studies, without ( nominal study ) and with ( informed study ) a priori knowledge on cycle-related IS variability informing insulin therapy. Glycemic metrics were computed on the obtained glucose traces. Results: In the pool of studied women, the glucose infusion rate area under the curve significantly decreased from FP to LP ( P = 0.0107), indicating an average decrease of IS in LP. When introduced in the simulator, this pattern led to increased time spent >180 and >250 mg/dL during LP versus FP in the nominal studies, irrespective of the insulin delivery strategy. In the informed studies, glycemic metrics stabilized across the cycle. Conclusion: This work suggests that current insulin delivery technology ma…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2022.0154

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diaz C., J. L., Fabris, C., Breton, M. D., & Cengiz, E.
Affiliations
  • Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Fabris, Chiara
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2022-10-31
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
832-841
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W4283076334
Cited by
19
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, menstrual cycle, insulin replacement therapy, artificial pancreas, euglycemic clamp, luteal phase, follicular phase, glycemic control, insulin dosing algorithms, in silico modeling
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Insulin Resistance, Menstrual Cycle, Technology, Insulin, Regular, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review