Cited by 54Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesClinical practice guidelines implementationPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Identifying Barriers to Hypertension Care: Implications for Quality Improvement Initiatives

Holland, Nan, Segraves, Denise, Nnadi, Victoria O., Belletti, Daniel A., Wogen, Jenifer, Arcona, Steve·2008·Disease Management

Abstract

The role of clinical inertia in the treatment of patients with hypertension was assessed by evaluating health care providers' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding hypertension management. A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Forsyth Medical Group in North Carolina. Participants were physicians (N = 18, 10 sites) and support staff (N = 20, 12 sites), who were surveyed in 2006. Physician and support staff questionnaires consisted of 29 and 15 items, respectively, and were administered by trained interviewers. Though most physicians (94%) cited familiarity with the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7) guidelines and affirmed that hypertension management guidelines are relevant to their patients, no physicians interviewed routinely document patient hypertension management plans. Although 1 in 3 physicians cited the inability to devote enough time to patients for the discussion of hypertension management, physicians predominantly cited patient- and support-staff- related factors as most important to patients not attaining blood pressure (BP) goal. Patient lifestyle modification (89%), education (67%), and medication compliance (56%) were cited as the most important reasons for uncontrolled BP. Only one-third of physicians believe that clinical staff always obtain accurate BP measurements, and 61% believe that resistant hypertension is a reflection of inaccurate BP measurement. Many support staff claimed to be rushed when measuring patient BP, and 65% recommended BP competency training. Contradictions were evident between provider knowledge of hypertension management standards and how this knowledge is applied in clinical practice. Standardized collection of BP is critical to measuring clinical improvement in hypertension. Results are being utilized to develop clinical improvement initiatives including staff education and competency training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dis.2008.1120007

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holland, N., Segraves, D., Nnadi, V. O., Belletti, D. A., Wogen, J., & Arcona, S.
Affiliations
  • Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center (US)
  • Novartis (United States) (US)
  • Tocalo Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Disease Management
Published
2008-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
71-77
ISSN
  • 1093-507X (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8860
OpenAlex
W2060435337
Cited by
54
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disease Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
antihypertensive therapy, clinical inertia, barriers to care, physician knowledge and attitudes, JNC 7 guidelines, blood pressure goal attainment, uncontrolled hypertension, medication adherence, lifestyle modification, blood pressure measurement accuracy, resistant hypertension, support staff, quality improvement
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Hypertension, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, North Carolina, Patient Compliance, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Care Surveys, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review