Cited by 22Climate Change Communication and PerceptionDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Exploitation of mortality salience in communication on climate change

Open access
Akil, Hussein, Robert-Demontrond, Philippe, Bouillé, Julien·2018·Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)

Abstract

This research focuses on the effectiveness of anxiety-inducing communication for mobilizing consumers against climate change. Based on terror management theory (TMT), we show that this register can be counterproductive in generating consumer choices that run counter to pro-environmental logics. In particular, we report the results of an experiment ( N = 132) testing the influence of the type of communication (anxiogenic vs informative) on consumer choices (pro-materialistic vs pro-environmental). The results reveal that people’s consumption choices depend on their cultural worldviews (i.e. materialistic vs environmentalist) and the type of communication used. The effectiveness of communication strategies on climate change is then discussed in terms of people’s cultural worldview.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2051570717745839

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MS participants with high (compared to low) environmental self-esteem more often selected the pro-environmental products.

    “MS participants with high (compared to low) environmental self- esteem more often selected the pro- environmental products.”

    From Terror Management Theory in the Consumer Domain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis on Mortality Salience Driven Consumer Responses (2025) · cites this paper as Akil et al. (2018)

    Table 3 (page unavailable) reports that, under mortality salience, participants deriving self-esteem from environmental actions were more likely to choose pro-environmental than materialistic options. It does not report the claim’s comparison of pro-environmental product selection between participants with high versus low environmental self-esteem. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MS led to more pro-materialistic choices compared to the control condition.

    “Results revealed a main effect; MS led to more pro- materialistic choices compared to the control condition.”

    From Terror Management Theory in the Consumer Domain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis on Mortality Salience Driven Consumer Responses (2025) · cites this paper as Akil et al. (2018)

    The ‘Effects of MS, environmental self-esteem and materialistic values on consumption choices’ section reports that 62.63% of participants exposed to anxiety-inducing climate communication made pro-materialistic choices. It also says choices were moderated by participants’ values and self-esteem; it does not establish the claimed overall main effect of more pro-materialistic choices than in the control condition. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MS participants with high (compared to low) materialistic values more often selected pro-materialistic products.

    “MS participants with high (compared to low) materialistic values more often selected pro- materialistic products”

    From Terror Management Theory in the Consumer Domain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis on Mortality Salience Driven Consumer Responses (2025) · cites this paper as Akil et al. (2018)

    In 'Effects of MS, environmental self-esteem and materialistic values on consumption choices' (page unavailable), the paper reports that participants with high materialistic values opted for pro-materialistic products under mortality salience. It does not report the claimed direct comparison showing that they selected those products more often than participants with low materialistic values. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Choi J, Kyoung-Nan K and Lee M (2007) Understanding materialistic consumption: A terror management per- spective. Journal of Research for Consumers 13(4): 1-4.
  2. Dechesne M, Pyszczynski T, Arndt J et al. (2003) Literal and symbolic immortality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(4): 722-737.
  3. Dobscha S and Ozanne JL (2001) An ecofeminist analysis of environmentally sensitive women using qualitative methodology: The emancipatory potential of an eco- logical life. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 20(2): 201-214.
  4. Durand F (2012) Réchauffement climatique: Le Nord n'est pas moins concerné que le Sud, Territoire en mouvement. Revue de géographie et aménagement 14(15): 21-33.
  5. Greenberg J (2011) From genesis to revelations. In: Shaver PR and Mikulincer M (eds) Meaning, Mortality, and Choice: The Social Psychology of Existential Concerns. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 17-35. Available at: http://portal.idc.ac.il/en/symposium/hspsp/2011/doc- uments/cgreenberg11.pdf (accessed 30 March 2017).
  6. Hamilton C (2010) Why we resist the truth about climate change. In: Climate controversies: Science and poli- tics conference, Brussels, 28 October.
  7. Lee-Wingate S, Moon J and Bose M (2014) The influ- ence of mortality focus on guilt advertising effec- tiveness. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 22(1): 103-114.
  8. Marquet V and Salles D (2014) L'adaptation au change- ment climatique en France et au Québec. Critique internationale 62(1): 73-92.
  9. Partouche-Sebban J (2013) Entre prévention et promo- tion l'impact de la saillance de mortalité΄ sur le cadrage situationnel en consommation et sur les préférences produits. Doctoral Thesis, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris.
  10. Solomon S, Greenberg J and Pyszczynski T (2004) The cultural animal: Twenty years of terror management theory and research. In: Greenberg J, Koole SL and Pyszczynski T (eds) Handbook of Existential Social Psychology. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 13-34.
  11. Trémolière B (2013) La rationalité des mortels: les pen- sées de mort perturbent les processus analytiques. Doctoral Thesis, Université Toulouse le Mirail- Toulouse II, Toulouse.
  12. Wong PT (2000) Full circle: Spiritual therapy for the elderly. Canadian Psychology 42(1): 85-86. 1. Interested 2. Upset 3. Excited 4. Distressed 5. Strongly 6. Guilty 7. Scared 8. Hostile 9. Enthusiastic 10. Proud 11. Irritable 12. Vigilant 13. Ashamed 14. Inspired 15. Tense 16. Determine 17. Attentive 18. Agitated 19. Active 20. Frightened PANAS: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Appendix 4. (Continued)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akil, H., Robert-Demontrond, P., & Bouillé, J.
Affiliations
  • Université de Rennes (FR)
  • Université Rennes 2 (FR)
Corresponding author
Akil, Hussein
Venue
Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)
Published
2018-01-11
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
2-29
ISSN
2051-5707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2784143208
Cited by
22
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-ALID-0005)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
mortality salience, terror management theory, climate change communication, consumer choice, pro-environmental behavior, materialism, cultural worldview, environmentalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review