Cited by 11Environmental Sustainability in BusinessClimate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainable Supply Chain Management

Carbon-Labeling Implementation in Taiwan by Combining Strength–Weakness–Opportunity–Threat and Analytic Network Processes

Hu, Allen H., Chen, Chia-Hsiang, Lan, Yi-Chen, Hong, Meng-Ying, Kuo, Chien-Hung·2019·Environmental Engineering Science

Abstract

Carbon label, which is also known as the carbon footprint label or carbon emission label, is the sum of carbon dioxide emissions generated from each stage in the life cycle of a product. Reports show that human activities increase greenhouse gas concentrations and cause global warming. Carbon-labeling schemes could fill the gap in climate policies by influencing the behavior of consumers toward the purchasing of green products. This finding indicates the significance of developing an internally applicable carbon-labeling policy before releasing international standards. Therefore, this study intends to provide an analytic network process and strength–weakness–opportunity–threat analysis approach to prioritize the carbon-labeling policy in Taiwan. Results indicate that the best policies for implementing carbon labeling in Taiwan include promotion through multiple approaches, aggressive utilization of government resources, intensive participation in international events, and extensive launch of international knowledge. In addition, this article provides guidelines and systemic decision patterns for carbon-labeling implementation to help governments and firms to develop and adjust their strategy for future carbon label implementation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ees.2018.0328

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asian countries have also come out with PCFs, EPDs, and PCRs, notably Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.

    “Asian countries have also come out with PCFs, EPDs, and PCRs, notably Japan, South Korea, and T aiwan (65).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, A. H., Chen, C.-H., Lan, Y.-C., Hong, M.-Y., & Kuo, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • National Taipei University of Technology (TW)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hu, Allen H.
Venue
Environmental Engineering Science
Published
2019-05
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
541-550
ISSN
  • 1092-8758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9018
OpenAlex
W2909092822
Cited by
11
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
carbon labeling, carbon footprint labeling, policy prioritization, green consumer behavior, greenhouse gas emissions, Taiwan, public policy implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review