Cited by 30Virus-based gene therapy researchRetinal Development and DisordersRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

The degree of adeno-associated virus-induced retinal inflammation varies based on serotype and route of delivery: intravitreal, subretinal, or suprachoroidal

Open access
Wiley, Luke A., Boyce, Timothy M., Meyering, Emily E., Ochoa, Dalyz, Sheehan, Katie M., Stone, Edwin M., Mullins, Robert F., Tucker, Budd A. +1 more·2023·Human Gene Therapy

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene therapy has great potential for treating a wide range of retinal degenerative diseases. However, some initial enthusiasm for gene therapy has been tempered by emerging evidence of AAV-associated inflammation, which in several instances has contributed to clinical trial discontinuation. Currently, there is a paucity of data describing the variable immune responses to different AAV serotypes, and similarly, little is known regarding how these responses differ depending on route of ocular delivery, including in animal models of disease. In this study, we characterize the severity and retinal distribution of AAV-associated inflammation in rats triggered by delivery of five different AAV vectors (AAV1, AAV2, AAV6, AAV8, and AAV9), each of which contained enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) driven under control of the constitutively active cytomegalovirus promoter. We further compare the inflammation across three different potential routes (intravitreal, subretinal, and suprachoroidal) of ocular delivery. Compared to buffer-injected controls for each route of delivery, AAV2 and AAV6 induced the most inflammation across all routes of delivery of vectors tested, with AAV6 inducing the highest levels of inflammation when delivered suprachoroidally. AAV1-induced inflammation was highest when delivered suprachoroidally, whereas minimal inflammation was seen with intravitreal delivery. In addition, AAV1, AAV2, and AAV6 each induce infiltration of adaptive immune cells like T cells and B cells into the neural retina, suggesting an innate adaptive response to a single dose of virus. AAV8 and AAV9 induced minimal inflammation across all routes of delivery. Importantly, the degree of inflammation was not correlated with vector-mediated transduction and expression of eGFP. These data emphasize the importance of considering ocular inflammation when selecting AAV serotypes and ocular delivery routes for the development of gene therapy strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hum.2022.222

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mice, IVT AAV2 injections without immunomodulation predominantly cause mild to moderate inflammation with ocular infiltration of CD45+ peripheral immune cells, including T cells.

    “Preclinical investigations utilizing mice have limited utility in predicting severe adverse events, as outcomes from AAV2 IVT injections without immunomodulation predominantly reveal mild to moderate inflammation accompanied by ocular infiltration of CD45+ peripheral immune cells, including T cells (30, 32–34).”

    From Intravitreal AAV vector delivery induces integrin-dependent ocular inflammation, complement activation, and antiviral and DNA damage responses (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Delivery of viral vector section (page unavailable) identifies the study animals as rats, not mice. The severity-and-location results (page unavailable) report inflammation after intravitreal AAV2 and CD3-positive T cells after AAV2 by all delivery routes. They do not establish predominantly mild-to-moderate inflammation or identify infiltrating cells as CD45-positive; the Discussion describes their origin as plausible rather than confirmed. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mouse preclinical investigations have limited utility in predicting severe adverse events from IVT AAV.

    “Preclinical investigations utilizing mice have limited utility in predicting severe adverse events”

    From Intravitreal AAV vector delivery induces integrin-dependent ocular inflammation, complement activation, and antiviral and DNA damage responses (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says species-specific differences make it difficult to translate animal-model findings about adverse effects to humans. It also notes that rats, rather than murine models, are the authors’ preferred model for preclinical toxicity testing. The paper does not specifically establish that mouse studies have limited utility for predicting severe adverse events from intravitreal AAV. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The type of promoter, AAV serotype and type of transgene affect treatment outcome and the degree of post-operative inflammation.

    “Finally, the type of promoter [14], AAV serotype [15] and type of transgene [16] also affect treatment outcome and the degree of post-operative inflammation.”

    From Characterization of anti-AAV2 neutralizing antibody levels in sheep prior to and following intravitreal AAV2.7m8 injection (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

    The discussion (page unavailable) reports that AAV serotype affects retinal inflammation in rats, and notes differences in retinal transduction between serotypes. It does not establish that serotype affects clinical treatment outcomes; the authors say they did not investigate consequences for retinal cell survival or death. The promoter and transgene parts of the sentence have separate citations and are not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Iba1+ cells from AAV-injected pigs showed upregulated SLA-DR, consistent with microglia activation.

    “Moreover, Iba1+ cells from injected animals showed upregulated Swine Leukocyte Antigen (SLA) major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II DR molecules (SLA-DR) (Figures 5D, F, G), consistent with microglia activation and in line with previous studies of subretinal and IVT AAV delivery in animal models (13, 34).”
  • Early manifestations of GTAU may be subclinical based on animal studies demonstrating microglial activation and immune cell infiltration in the outer retina without overt clinical signs of intraocular inflammation.

    “Early manifestations of GTAU may be subclinical based on animal studies demonstrating microglial activation and immune cell infiltration in the outer retina without overt clinical signs of intraocular inflam­ mation (Chan et al., 2021b; Chandler et al., 2021; Wiley et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiley, L. A., Boyce, T. M., Meyering, E. E., Ochoa, D., Sheehan, K. M., Stone, E. M., Mullins, R. F., Tucker, B. A., & Han, I. C.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Ian C.
Venue
Human Gene Therapy
Published
2023-06
Volume
34
Issue
11-12
Pages
530-539
ISSN
  • 1043-0342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7422
OpenAlex
W4321004399
Cited by
30
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (P30EY025580)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
adeno-associated virus, AAV serotypes, retinal inflammation, ocular gene therapy, intravitreal delivery, subretinal delivery, AAV2, AAV6, AAV8, AAV9, AAV1, T cells, B cells, retinal degeneration
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Genetic Vectors, Inflammation, Retina, Retinal Degeneration, Transduction, Genetic, Rats, Serogroup

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review