Cited by 102Retinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy researchMitochondrial Function and Pathology

Immune Response and Intraocular Inflammation in Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Treated With Intravitreal Injection of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus 2 Carrying the ND4 Gene

Open access
Bouquet, Céline, Vignal Clermont, Catherine, Galy, Anne, Fitoussi, Serge, Blouin, Laure, Munk, Marion R., Valero, Sonia, Meunier, Sandrine +3 more·2019·JAMA Ophthalmology

Abstract

Importance: Intravitreal gene therapy is regarded as generally safe with limited mild adverse events, but its systemic effects remain to be investigated. Objective: To examine the association between immune response and intraocular inflammation after ocular gene therapy with recombinant adeno-associated virus 2 carrying the ND4 gene (rAAV2/2-ND4). Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of an open-label, dose-escalation phase 1/2 randomized clinical trial of rAAV2/2-ND4 included data from February 13, 2014 (first patient visit), to March 30, 2017 (last patient visit at week 96), the first 2 years after injection. Patients older than 15 years with diagnosed ND4 Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and visual acuity of at least counting fingers were enrolled in 1 of 5 cohorts. Four dose cohorts of 3 patients each were treated sequentially. An extension cohort of 3 patients received the dose of 9 × 1010 viral genomes per eye. Interventions: Patients received increasing doses of rAAV2/2-ND4 (9 × 109, 3 × 1010, 9 × 1010, and 1.8 × 1011 viral genomes per eye) as a single unilateral intravitreal injection. Patients were monitored for 96 weeks after injection; ocular examinations were performed regularly, and blood samples were collected for immunologic testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: A composite ocular inflammation score (OIS) was calculated based on grades of anterior chamber cells and flare, vitreous cells, and haze according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature. The systemic immune response was quantified by enzyme-linked immunospot (cellular immune response), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgG titers), and luciferase assay (neutralizing antibody [NAb] titers). Results: The present analysis included 15 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.9 [17.2] years; 13 men and 2 women) enrolled in the 5 cohorts of the clinical trial. Thirteen patients experienced intraocular inflammation after rAAV2/2-ND4 administration. Mild anterior chamber inflammation and vitritis were reported at all doses, and all cases were responsive to treatment. A maximum OIS of 9.5 was observed in a patient with history of idiopathic uveitis. Overall, OIS was not associated with the viral dose administered. No NAbs against AAV2 were detected in aqueous humor before treatment. Two patients tested positive for cellular immune response against AAV2 at baseline and after treatment. Humoral immune response was not apparently associated with the dose administered or with the immune status of patients at baseline. No association was found between OISs and serum NAb titers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, intravitreal administration of rAAV2/2-ND4 in patients with LHON was safe and well tolerated. Further investigations may shed light into the local immune response to rAAV2/2-ND4 as a potential explanation for the observed intraocular inflammation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6902

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 25 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    LHON treatment has been limited to supportive care rather than cure.

    “Therapy for LHON has been restricted to supportive measures rather than cure.10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] 10. Klopstock T, Yu-Wai-Man P, Dimitriadis K, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of idebenone in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Brain. 2011; 134(Pt 9):2677-2686. doi:10.1093/brain/awr170 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says that advances had not yet produced treatments of proven efficacy for mitochondrial DNA-associated diseases and that earlier LHON studies were limited. This supports the absence of an established cure, but the paper does not say LHON therapy was restricted to supportive measures; it reports that idebenone appeared to improve visual outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    The results are consistent with prior work in cynomolgus macaques showing that neutralizing antibody detection in the anterior chamber and serum did not correlate with greater exposure to intravitreal AAV vectors.

    “Our results are consistent with previous work 38 in cynomolgus macaques showing that detection of NAbs in the anterior chamber and serum did not correlate with increased exposure to intravitreal AAV vectors;”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] 38. Vandamme C, Adjali O, Mingozzi F. Unraveling the complex story of immune responses to AAV vectors trial after trial. Hum Gene Ther. 2017;28(11): 1061-1074. doi:10.1089/hum.2017.150 source

      The ‘Impact of neutralizing anti-AAV antibodies’ section discusses subretinal AAV administration, but not intravitreal exposure or antibody detection in the anterior chamber and serum. Searches for ‘cynomolgus macaques anterior chamber,’ ‘anterior chamber,’ and ‘intravitreal’ found no passage reporting the claimed lack of correlation. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    The occurrence of intraocular inflammation matched that seen in a preclinical study of rAAV2/2-ND4.

    “Occurrence of intraocular inflammation was consistent with a preclinical study 30 using rAAV2/2-ND4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] 30. Matet A, Kostic C, Bemelmans AP, et al. Evaluation of tolerance to lentiviral LV-RPE65 gene therapy vector after subretinal delivery in non-human primates. Transl Res. 2017;188:40-57.e4. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2017.06.012 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports intraocular inflammation in this preclinical study, including a marked but transient reaction in one animal. However, the study used LV-RPE65, and the passages found for rAAV2/2-ND4 do not establish that its inflammation matched findings from a preclinical rAAV2/2-ND4 study. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Thirteen of 15 patients developed intraocular inflammation after receiving rAAV2/2-ND4.

    “Thirteen patients experienced intraocular inflammation after rAAV2/2-ND4 administration.”
    • Also stated in: § Assessment of Ocular Inflammation After rAAV2/2-ND4 Administration · plain
      “Thirteen of 15 patients experienced intraocular inflammation after rAAV2/2-ND4 administration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    No association was found between ocular inflammation intensity and administered dose.

    “No association was found between intensity of ocular inflammation and dose administered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The eye is regarded as immune privileged and therefore a good organ for gene therapy.

    “The eye is considered to be immune privileged and thus constitutes an optimal organ for gene therapy.12,13”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. Stein-Streilein J. Immune regulation and the eye. Trends Immunol. 2008;29(11):548-554. doi:10. 1016/j.it.2008.08.002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [13] 13. Lam BL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, et al. Trial end points and natural history in patients with G11778A Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: preparation for gene therapy clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132 (4):428-436. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7971 source

      The Discussion describes a planned ocular gene therapy trial for G11778A LHON, but does not say the eye is immune privileged or that immune privilege makes it an optimal organ for gene therapy. Searches for immune privilege and ocular immune responses found no passage addressing that rationale. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AAVs are currently the most promising retinal gene delivery vectors; they are nonpathogenic, infect retinal cells effectively, and have low intrinsic immunogenicity.

    “Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are currently the most promising transfer vectors for gene delivery to the retina; they are not pathogenic, can infect the retinal cells effectively, 15,16 and have low intrinsic immunogenicity.17”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] 15. Kumar-Singh R. Barriers for retinal gene therapy: separating fact from fiction. Vision Res. 2008;48(16): 1671-1680. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.005 source
    • cites [16] 16. Sun JY, Anand-Jawa V, Chatterjee S, Wong KK. Immune responses to adeno-associated virus and its recombinant vectors. Gene Ther. 2003;10(11): 964-976. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3302039 source
    • cites [17] 17. Yang S, Ma SQ, Wan X, et al. Long-term outcomes of gene therapy for the treatment of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. EBioMedicine. 2016;10:258-268. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.002 source

      The Results (Bilateral Gene therapy; page not specified) report sustained retinal ND4 expression after rAAV-ND4 injection and no abnormal AAV2 antibody concentrations, supporting retinal gene delivery and a limited immune-response finding. The paper does not establish that AAVs are the most promising retinal vectors, are nonpathogenic in general, or have low intrinsic immunogenicity. (LLM, conf=0.81)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The G11778A substitution in the ND4 gene explains most LHON cases and the most severe presentations.

    “The G to A substitution at nucleotide 11778 (G11778A) in the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (ND4) gene (OMIM 516003) accounts for most cases of LHON and the most severe manifestations.4,7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. Meyerson C, Van Stavern G, McClelland C. Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1165-1176. source

      The Genetics and incomplete penetrance section says the 11778 mutation accounts for 70% of LHON cases, and the Gene therapy section links it to ND4. The Prognosis section says it has the lowest partial visual-recovery rate (4%), but does not establish that it causes the most severe manifestations overall; the LHON plus section links particularly severe syndromes to other mutations. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [7] 7. Newman NJ. Hereditary optic neuropathies: from the mitochondria to the optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(3):517-523. doi:10.1016/j.ajo. 2005.03.017 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    rAAV2/2-ND4 encodes the wild-type ND4 protein and has proof of concept in a rat LHON model.

    “The recombinant AAV2 vector carrying the ND4 gene (rAAV2/2-ND4) (GS010) encodes the wild-type ND4 protein and has a proof of concept that was successfully demonstrated in a rat model of LHON.26”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] 26. Vignal C, Uretsky S, Fitoussi S, et al. Safety of rAAV2/2-ND4 gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(6): 945-947. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.036 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The anti-AAV2 neutralizing antibody response overall did not appear linked to baseline levels or to the dose given.

    “Overall, the anti-AAV2 NAb response did not seem to be associated with levels at baseline or the dose administered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All intraocular inflammation cases responded to treatment, resolving after topical anti-inflammatory therapy.

    “and all cases were responsive to treatment.”
    • Also stated in: § Assessment of Ocular Inflammation After rAAV2/2-ND4 Administration · plain
      “All events resolved after treatment with topical anti-inflammatory therapy (eTable 3 in the Supplement).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Baseline anti-AAV2 neutralizing antibody titers varied widely among the 15 patients, spanning from 0 to 1:2850.

    “Baseline NAb titers were highly variable among patients, ranging from 0 to 1:2850 (median titer, 1:48) in a patient in the 9 × 10 10 vg dose group (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At baseline, anti-AAV2 IgG levels varied widely, from 13 to 10 295 × 10 -3 AU/mL (mean 536 × 10 -3 AU/mL), with low levels (<1000 × 10 -3 AU/mL) in 9 of 15 patients.

    “At baseline, anti-AAV2 IgG levels were highly variable among patients, ranging from 13 to 10 295 × 10 -3 AU/mL (with a mean at baseline of 536 × 10 -3 AU/mL), with low levels of IgG (<1000 × 10 -3 AU/mL) in 9 of the 15 patients (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither ocular inflammation nor immune response could be predicted from the viral dose administered or the patient's baseline immune status.

    “Neither ocular inflammation nor immune response could be determined based on the viral dose administered or the patient's immune status at baseline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Before administration, one patient in the 9 × 10^10 vg dose group had the highest serum IgG and neutralizing antibody titers and tested positive for cellular response against AAV2.

    “Before administration, the patient had the highest IgG and NAb titers in serum and tested positive for cellular response against AAV2;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After unilateral intravitreal rAAV2/2-ND4 injection, a transient mild rise in serum neutralizing antibody titer and treatment-responsive uveitis resolved without long-term sequelae.

    “After unilateral intravitreal injection of rAAV2/2-ND4, a transient mild increase in serum NAb titer and treatmentresponsive uveitis resolved without any long-term sequelae.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The follow-up period was long enough to detect long-term sequelae of the ocular inflammation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall humoral immune response against AAV2 peaked between 12 and 24 weeks after administration, with positive IgG responses in 9 of 15 patients.

    “The overall humoral immune response against AAV2 peaked between 12 and 24 weeks after administration (eFigure 2 in the Supple- ment), with positive IgG responses in 9 of 15 patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eight of 13 vitreous inflammation events were treated with topical anti-inflammatory agents, and 3 events in 2 patients also received oral corticosteroids.

    “Eight of 13 events were treated with topical anti-inflammatory agents, and 3 events in 2 patients were also treated with oral corticosteroids (eTable 3 in the Supplement).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In this study, 9 patients received at least 9 × 10^10 vg per eye, and only 1 of them had severe ocular inflammation.

    “In our study, 9 patients received a dose of 9 × 10 10 vg per eye or more, and only 1 of these patients presented with severe ocular inflammation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Before treatment, neutralizing antibodies against AAV2 were absent in six patients, under 1:1000 in seven, and over 1:1000 in two.

    “At baseline, anti-AAV2 NAb titers were undetectable in 6 patients, below 1:1000 in 7 patients, and above 1:1000 in 2 patients (1 each in the 9 × 10 9 vg and 9 × 10 10 vg dose groups).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    For example, a patient in the 9 × 10 10 vg group had a maximum OIS of 5 from concomitant anterior and intermediate uveitis, both rated mild by the examiner.

    “For example, a patient in the 9 × 10 10 vg dose group had a maximum OIS of 5 as the result of concomitant anterior and intermediate uveitis, both of which were considered by the examiner to be of mild intensity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The humoral immune response was not apparently associated with the administered dose or with patients' baseline immune status.

    “Humoral immune response was not apparently associated with the dose administered or with the immune status of patients at baseline.”
    • Also stated in: § Immunogenicity of rAAV2/2-ND4 in Patients With LHON · plain
      “The anti-AAV2 IgG response did not correlate with levels at baseline or the dose administered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Systemic immune responses to rAAV2 were transient and matched previous literature observations.

    “systemic immune responses to recombinant adeno-associated virus 2 were transient and consistent with previous observations reported in the literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The present analysis included 15 patients (mean age 47.9 years, SD 17.2; 13 men and 2 women) enrolled in 5 cohorts.

    “The present analysis included 15 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.9 [17.2] years; 13 men and 2 women) enrolled in the 5 cohorts of the clinical trial.”
    • Also stated in: § Assessment of Ocular Inflammation After rAAV2/2-ND4 Administration · plain
      “Fifteen patients (mean [SD] age, 47.9 [17.2] years; 13 men and 2 women) were enrolled in the 5 cohorts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A patient in the 9 × 10^9 vg dose group had positive IgG and neutralizing antibody responses but no ocular inflammation.

    “A patient in the 9 × 10 9 vg dose group had positive IgG and NAb responses but did not have ocular inflammation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All ocular inflammation events were mild by CTCAE except in 1 patient in the 9 × 10 10 vg group who had severe anterior chamber inflammation and vitritis 13 days after injection.

    “All events of ocular inflammation were mild in intensity according to the CTCAE except in 1 patient in the 9 × 10 10 vg dose group who experienced concomitant severe anterior chamber inflammation and vitritis 13 days after injection of rAAV2/2-ND4.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The two highest individual OISs were 5 at week 8 and 9.5 at week 4, both in patients in the 9 × 10 10 vg group.

    “The 2 highest individual OISs were reported in a patient in the 9 × 10 10 vg with a score of 5 at week 8 and a patient in the 9 × 10 10 vg dose group with a score of 9.5 at week 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two weeks after intravitreal injection, that patient had severe ocular inflammation and the highest ocular inflammation score as well as IgG and neutralizing antibody titers.

    “2 weeks after intravitreal injection, the patient had severe ocular inflammation and the highest OIS as well as IgG and NAb titers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Intraocular inflammation in these patients was mostly mild, self-limited, and responsive to treatment.

    “Ocular gene therapy with rAAV2/2-ND4 in these 15 patients appeared to be overall safe and well tolerated with mostly mild, self-limited intraocular inflammation responsive to treatment that might be prevented using prophylactic immunosuppressive therapy in future trials.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The follow-up period was long enough to detect long-term sequelae of the ocular inflammation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Leber hereditary optic neuropathy is the most frequent inherited mitochondrial disorder.

    “L eber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is the most common inherited mitochondrial disease.[1][2][3]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1][2][3]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    LHON results from a mitochondrial DNA point mutation affecting a complex I subunit (NADH dehydrogenase), an oxidative phosphorylation enzyme.

    “Leber hereditary optic neuropathy is caused by a point mutation in mitochondrial DNA, [4][5][6] affecting a subunit of complex I (NADH dehydrogenase), an enzyme of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway.[6][7][8][9]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4][5][6]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [6][7][8][9]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LHON preferentially damages retinal ganglion cells of the papillomacular bundle, leading to optic nerve degeneration and severe bilateral vision loss.

    “It is characterized by preferential involvement of the retinal ganglion cells of the papillomacular bundle with ensuing optic nerve degeneration and severe bilateral vision loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1][2]2][3]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In this study, intravitreal rAAV2/2-ND4 in patients with LHON was safe and well tolerated.

    “In this study, intravitreal administration of rAAV2/2-ND4 in patients with LHON was safe and well tolerated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    No adjustment was made for multiple analyses.

    “No adjustment was made for multiple analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CpG-rich viral genomes, such as the rAAV2/2-ND4 vector, can activate Toll-like receptors and trigger an innate immune response.

    “It is known that CpG-rich viral genomes, such as that of the rAAV2/2-ND4 vector, can activate Toll-like receptors and trigger an innate immune response.39,40”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [39] 39. Ertl HCJ, High KA. Impact of AAV capsid-specific T-cell responses on design and outcome of clinical gene transfer trials with recombinant adeno- associated viral vectors: an evolving controversy. Hum Gene Ther. 2017;28(4):328-337. doi:10.1089/hum. 2016.172 source
    • cites [40]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Patients received no immunomodulatory therapy before intravitreal injection.

    “Patients did not receive any immunomodulatory therapy before intravitreal injection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Vitritis (intermediate uveitis) occurred at all dose levels and was considered probably related to treatment by the investigator.

    “Vitritis (intermediate uveitis) was reported at all dose levels and was considered by the investigator (C.V.C.) to be probably related to treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Prophylactic corticotherapy should be considered in future rAAV2/2-ND4 trials to reduce inflammatory responses.

    “These findings suggest that systematic use of prophylactic corticotherapy should be considered in future trials of rAAV2/2-ND4 to lessen inflammatory responses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    The host immune response is an important factor to monitor after gene therapy because it may affect both safety and efficacy.

    “As such, the host immune response is a relevant factor to monitor after gene therapy because it may relate to both the safety and the efficacy of the treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Idebenone has been used in the European Union despite uncertain efficacy, because a phase 3 trial did not differ statistically from placebo.

    “Idebenone (Raxone), a synthetic analogue of coenzyme Q10, has been used by practitioners in the European Union albeit with controversial efficacy, because results from a phase 3 study were not statistically different from placebo.11”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] 11. Streilein JW. Ocular immune privilege: therapeutic opportunities from an experiment of nature. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(11):879-889. doi:10.1038/nri1224 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    A composite global OIS was calculated from four SUN grades: anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, vitreous cells, and vitreous haze.

    “In this post hoc analysis, a composite global ocular inflammation score (OIS) was determined using 4 separate grades according to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature classification (eTable 2 in the Supplement): anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, vitreous cells, and vitreous haze.29”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] 29. Thomasson N, Galy A, Fitoussi S, et al. Relevance of NHP safety studies for ocular delivery of AAV-based gene therapy in humans: example of rAAV2/2-ND4 local tolerability, shedding and immunogenicity for the treatment of LHON, after IVT injection in non-human primates and in LHON patients. Poster presented at: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; May 3-7, 2015; Denver, Colorado.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    One patient with untreated ongoing mild vitritis withdrew consent after 48 weeks and was unavailable for follow-up.

    “1 patient with untreated ongoing mild vitritis withdrew consent past 48 weeks and was unavailable for follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several ongoing trials are assessing safety and efficacy of ocular gene therapies, and no serious treatment- or procedure-related adverse events have been reported.

    “Several ongoing trials are evaluating the safety and efficacy of such ocular gene therapies, and as yet no serious adverse events (AEs) related to treatment or procedure have been reported.[18][19][20][21][22]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18][19][20][21][22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study is limited by the small number of patients and high interpatient variability at baseline.

    “This study is limited by the small number of patients and the high interpatient variability at baseline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    rAAV2/2-ND4 is not highly immunogenic when injected into the vitreous, because not every patient given a medium or high dose developed an immune response.

    “In our study, not every patient administered a medium or high dose developed an immune response, indicating that rAAV2/2-ND4 is not highly immunogenic when injected in the vitreous.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These results support continuing gene therapy in LHON and other families of eye diseases.

    “These results support the continuation of gene therapy in LHON and other families of eye diseases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
41 of 41
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The systemic effects of intravitreal gene therapy still need investigation.

    “but its systemic effects remain to be investigated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An AAV2 vector carrying wild-type ND4 can be easily given intravitreally to LHON patients with the G11778A mutation.

    “An AAV2 vector containing the wild-type ND4 gene can easily be administered intravitreally to patients with LHON carrying the G11778A mutation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The follow-up period was long enough to detect long-term sequelae of the ocular inflammation.

    “After unilateral intravitreal injection of rAAV2/2-ND4, a transient mild increase in serum NAb titer and treatmentresponsive uveitis resolved without any long-term sequelae.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Bouquet et al trial, oral steroids were used effectively in 2/11 patients who did not respond to topical therapy.

    “Oral steroids were used effectively in 2/11 patients who did not respond to topical therapy.”

    From Ocular Gene Therapy: A Literature Review with Special Focus on Immune and Inflammatory Responses (2022) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Assessment of Ocular Inflammation section (page unavailable) reports vitreous inflammation in 11 patients and oral corticosteroid treatment for three events in two of them; all treated events resolved. It does not say those two patients had failed to respond to topical therapy before receiving oral steroids. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A first-in-human trial (GS-LHON-CLIN-01) showed that a single intravitreal administration of increasing doses of rAAV2/2-ND4 was safe and well tolerated in LHON subjects.

    “Based on these preclinical studies, a first-in-human trial (GS-LHON-CLIN-01) showed that a single intravitreal administration of increasing doses of rAAV2/2-ND4 was safe and well tolerated in LHON subjects.16,17”

    From Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Gene Therapy for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Treated within 6 Months of Disease Onset (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Phase 1/2 Clinical Study Protocol describes dose escalation and intravitreal injection in 15 patients with LHON, and the Conclusions say treatment appeared overall safe and well tolerated. Our copy identifies the trial as NCT02064569 but does not identify it as GS-LHON-CLIN-01 or explicitly establish that it was first-in-human. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These features are typically seen within a few weeks of intravitreal injection, particularly with higher vector doses.

    “These features are typically seen within a few weeks of intravitreal injection, particularly with higher vector doses (Cukras et al., 2018; Vignal-Clermont et al., 2018; Bouquet et al., 2019).”

    From Gene Therapy-Associated Uveitis (GTAU): Understanding and mitigating the adverse immune response in retinal gene therapy (2025) · cites this paper as Bouquet et al., 2019

    The Assessment of Ocular Inflammation section (p. 402) reports that the mean inflammation score peaked four weeks after injection, supporting the timing in broad terms. But it reports no association between inflammation intensity and dose, and says the score’s magnitude did not correlate with dose; the claim that these features are seen particularly with higher doses is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bouquet et al showed that neither baseline antibodies nor the degree of immune response, defined by increased antibody titers, correlated with the degree of intraocular inflammation.

    “which is further supported by the work of Bouquet et al79 who showed that neither baseline Abs nor the degree of immune response, defined by increased Ab titers, correlated with the degree of intraocular inflammation.”
  • Bouquet et al assessed the link between immune response and intraocular inflammation in 15 patients diagnosed with ND4 LHON undergoing ocular gene therapy with rAAV2 vectors.

    “In an open-label phase I/II randomized clinical trial, Bouquet et al79 assessed the link between immune response and intraocular inflammation in 15 patients diagnosed with ND4 LHON undergoing ocular gene therapy with rAAV2 vectors.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouquet, C., Vignal Clermont, C., Galy, A., Fitoussi, S., Blouin, L., Munk, M. R., Valero, S., Meunier, S., Katz, B., Sahel, J. A., & Thomasson, N.
Affiliations
  • GenSight Biologics (France) (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Katz, Barrett
Venue
JAMA Ophthalmology
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
137
Issue
4
Pages
399
ISSN
2168-6165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914705959
Cited by
102
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
Keywords
Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy, intravitreal gene therapy, recombinant adeno-associated virus 2, ND4 gene, ocular inflammation, immune response, vitritis, anterior chamber inflammation
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Electroretinography, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Follow-Up Studies, Fundus Oculi, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-29.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-29.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review