The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topical Ocular Drug Delivery: Recent Developments and Future Challenges
Abstract
Existing ocular drug delivery systems are fairly primitive and inefficient, but the stage is set for the rational design of newer and significantly improved systems. The focus of this review is on recent developments in topical ocular drug delivery systems relative to their success in overcoming the constraints imposed by the eye and to the improvements that have yet to be made. In addition, this review attempts to place in perspective the importance of pharmacokinetic modeling, ocular drug pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies, and choice of animal models in the design and evaluation of these delivery systems. Five future challenges are perceived to confront the field. These are: (a) The extent to which the protective mechanisms of the eye can be safely altered to facilitate drug absorption, (b) Delivery of drugs to the posterior portion of the eye from topical dosing, (c) Topical delivery of macromolecular drugs including those derived from biotechnology, (d) Improved technology which will permit non-invasive monitoring of ocular drug movement, and (e) Predictive animal models in all phases of ocular drug evaluation. The design of ocular drug delivery systems is undergoing a gradual transition from an empirical to a rational base. This is partly due to a better understanding of the constraints on drug disposition in the eye and partly due to improved approaches in animal and clinical assessment of ocular drugs and drug delivery systems. Undoubtedly, interest in the broad area of ocular drug delivery has increased in recent years due to an increased understanding of a number of ocular physiological processes and pathological conditions, including aqueous humor dynamics, inflammation, corneal wound healing, and cataractogenesis, with a parallel increase in the number of drugs and drug candidates that have a beneficial effect in these conditions. Some of these compounds are rather potent and, at the same time, possess unfavorable aqueous solubility, stability, and lipophilicity characteristics. The inevitable result is that the formulation of these compounds for optimal topical delivery to the eye is increasingly challenging, much more so for the posterior than for the anterior portion of the eye. Coincidentally, the design of ocular drug delivery systems is becoming more sophisticated, partly due to a better understanding of the constraints in ocular drug disposition and partly due to the availability of polymers with a wide range of properties including biodegradability and bioadhesiveness. A number of recent reviews (1-5) have provided excellent background information on corneal drug transport mechanisms, ocular drug bioavailability, and ocular drug pharmacokinetics. Although a portion of each of these reviews also deals with the subject of ocular drug delivery, either directly or indirectly, a comprehensive current review of this subject does not appear to be available in the literature, hence the purpose of this article. Specifically, this paper will first review and describe (a) the constraints in topical ocular drug delivery, (b) mechanisms and constraints of ocular drug absorption, and (c) mathematics and modelling of ocular drug disposition in order to set the stage for understanding (a) the approaches that can be taken to optimize ocular drug delivery, (b) the suitability of rabbits as an animal model to evaluate ocular drug delivery systems, and (c) new challenges in ocular drug delivery system design. To provide a framework for subsequent discussions, it is useful to describe typical boundaries that are encountered in topical drug application. It is common to see approximately 1% or less of an applied dose absorbed across the cornea to reach anterior segment tissues of the eye. This, therefore, is an extremely inefficient process that also signals a substantial systemic drug load. Obviously, subsequent movement of this absorbed drug to the posterior segment of the eye will occur for only a tiny fraction of that which is in the anterior segment. In addition to the fraction of dose absorbed, the issue of residence time in the living eye is also important. Typically, an instilled aqueous solution will be eliminated from the precorneal area within 90 seconds. All things considered, improving the fraction of dose absorbed, achieving relatively high drug concentrations in the posterior segment, and maintaining drug in the front of the eye for several hours to several days are considerable challenges in ocular drug delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holly, F. J., & Lemp, M. A. (1977) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0039-6257(77)90087-x · Cited by 559
Corneal Penetration Behavior of β-Blocking Agents I: Physicochemical Factors
Huang, H.-S., & Schoenwald, R. D. (1983) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.2600721108 · Cited by 422
Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral-controlled drug delivery: method to study bioadhesion
Park, K., & Robinson, J. R. (1984) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/0378-5173(84)90154-6 · Cited by 420
Self-citationOphthalmic drug delivery systems
Shell, J. W. (1984) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0039-6257(84)90168-1 · Cited by 291
Drop Size and Initial Dosing Frequency Problems of Topically Applied Ophthalmic Drugs
Chrai, S. S., Makoid, M. C., Eriksen, S. P., & Robinson, J. R. (1974) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.2600630304 · Cited by 254
Self-citationMechanistic and Quantitative Evaluation of Precorneal Pilocarpine Disposition in Albino Rabbits
Lee, V. H.-L., & Robinson, J. R. (1979) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.2600680606 · Cited by 230
Self-citationStudies on the mechanism of drug-binding to melanin
Larsson, B., & Tjälve, H. (1979) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0006-2952(79)90326-5 · Cited by 228
Effect of poloxamer 407 gel on the miotic activity of pilocarpine nitrate in rabbits
Miller, S. C., & Donovan, M. D. (1982) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/0378-5173(82)90114-4 · Cited by 210
Transport processes across the rabbit corneal epithelium: a review
Klyce, S. D., & Crosson, C. E. (1985) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.3109/02713688509025145 · Cited by 185
Maren, T. H., Jankowska, L., Sanyal, G., & Edelhauser, H. F. (1983) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4835(83)90041-6 · Cited by 159
Cited by
Gaudana, R., Ananthula, H. K., Parenky, A., & Mitra, A. K. (2010) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-010-9183-3 · Cited by 1,406
Mandal, A., Bisht, R., Rupenthal, I. D., & Mitra, A. K. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.012 · Cited by 481
Ocular drug delivery: present innovations and future challenges
Gote, V., Sikder, S., Sicotte, J., & Pal, D. (2019) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.119.256933 · Cited by 441
Nanoparticles for drug delivery to the anterior segment of the eye
Janagam, D. R., Wu, L., & Lowe, T. L. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.001 · Cited by 341
Hosoya, K.-I., Lee, V. H. L., & Kim, K.-J. (2005) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.12.007 · Cited by 194
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LEE, V. H. L., & ROBINSON, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-108
- ISSN
- 1080-7683 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7732
- OpenAlex
- W1985933245
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topical Ocular Drug Delivery: Recent Developments and Future Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/jop.1986.2.67
- The paper
- LEE, V. H. L., & ROBINSON, J. R. (1986). Topical Ocular Drug Delivery: Recent Developments and Future Challenges. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.1986.2.67
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.