Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nucleotide Bias Observed with a Short SELEX RNA Aptamer Library

Thiel, William H., Bair, Thomas, Wyatt Thiel, Kristina, Dassie, Justin P., Rockey, William M., Howell, Craig A., Liu, Xiuying Y., Dupuy, Adam J., Huang, Lingyan, Owczarzy, Richard, Behlke, Mark A., Mcnamara, James O., Giangrande, Paloma H.·2011·Nucleic Acid Therapeutics

Abstract

Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) is a powerful in vitro selection process used for over 2 decades to identify oligonucleotide sequences (aptamers) with desired properties (usually high affinity for a protein target) from randomized nucleic acid libraries. In the case of RNA aptamers, several highly complex RNA libraries have been described with RNA sequences ranging from 71 to 81 nucleotides (nt) in length. In this study, we used high-throughput sequencing combined with bioinformatics analysis to thoroughly examine the nucleotide composition of the sequence pools derived from several selections that employed an RNA library ( Sel2N20 ) with an abbreviated variable region. The Sel2N20 yields RNAs 51 nt in length, which unlike longer RNAs, are more amenable to large-scale chemical synthesis for therapeutic development. Our analysis revealed a consistent and early bias against inclusion of adenine, resulting in aptamers with lower predicted minimum free energies (Δ G ) (higher structural stability). This bias was also observed in control, “nontargeted” selections in which the partition step (against the target) was omitted, suggesting that the bias occurred in 1 or more of the amplification and propagation steps of the SELEX process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/nat.2011.0288

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth946 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.1098119 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0162-3109(99)00020-X · DOI
  4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth374 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90357-X · DOI
  6. CHEN J.H., , LE S.Y., , SHAPIRO B., , CURREY K.M., , MAIZEL J.V. 1990. A computational procedure for assessing the significance of RNA secondary structure. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 6:7–18.
  7. 10.1261/rna.7220505 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nbt.1560 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.016 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/346818a0 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.83.24.9373 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1073/pnas.0704754104 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.287.5454.820 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/BF00818163 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/bi962674l · DOI
  16. 10.1093/nar/17.15.6143 · DOI
  17. LUPOLD S.E., , HICKE B.J., , LIN Y., , COFFEY D.S. 2002. Identification and Characterization of nuclease-stabilized rna molecules that bind human prostate cancer cells via the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res., 62:4029–4033.
  18. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1172/JCI33365 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s00239-004-2590-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/mt.2008.235 · DOI
  22. 10.1146/annurev.med.56.062904.144915 · DOI
  23. 10.1089/oli.2007.0089 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/27.6.1561 · DOI
  25. 10.1039/b510458k · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.273.32.20556 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nature00963 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/364550a0 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00140.x · DOI
  30. 10.1089/oli.2009.0199 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.2200121 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nbt1144 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50101-6 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/nar/gkp185 · DOI
  35. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009169 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thiel, W. H., Bair, T., Wyatt Thiel, K., Dassie, J. P., Rockey, W. M., Howell, C. A., Liu, X. Y., Dupuy, A. J., Huang, L., Owczarzy, R., Behlke, M. A., Mcnamara, J. O., & Giangrande, P. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa
  • Integrated DNA Technologies
Venue
Nucleic Acid Therapeutics
Published
2011-08
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
253-263
ISSN
  • 2159-3337
  • 2159-3345
Cited by
66
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review