Cited by 101Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Clinical appraisal of chronic traumatic encephalopathy: current perspectives and future directions

Gavett, Brandon E., Cantu, Robert C., Shenton, Martha, Lin, Alexander P., Nowinski, Christopher J., McKee, Ann C., Stern, Robert A.·2011·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are currently no consensus-based clinical diagnostic criteria for chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). This review provides an update on recent literature pertaining to clinically relevant procedures that--presently or in the future--may be useful for the in-vivo detection, characterization, and/or prediction of CTE. RECENT FINDINGS: Preliminary evidence about the clinical manifestations of CTE has been accumulating via post-mortem medical record review and interviews of friends or family members of individuals with neuropathologically documented CTE. This evidence suggests that CTE is manifested clinically by changes in cognition (especially memory and executive functioning, with dementia later in the disease course), mood (especially, depression, apathy, and suicidality), personality and behavior (especially poor impulse control and behavioral disinhibition), and movement (including parkinsonism and signs of motor neuron disease). At the present time, evidence regarding CTE has not been confirmed in a prospective study of a cohort at risk for CTE. SUMMARY: On the basis of recent research in the fields of dementia and traumatic brain injury, several in-vivo procedures (including neurological examination, neuropsychological assessment, neuroimaging techniques, and blood and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers) each have the potential to contribute unique information about the manifestations of CTE, including clinical and preclinical stages. More research is needed to develop a set of consensus diagnostic criteria that provide a reliable and valid indicator of neuropathologically verified CTE. Until such criteria are developed, the clinical assessment of CTE should be informed by modern research that is of relevance to traumatic brain injury and neurodegenerative diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0b013e32834cd477

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gavett, B. E., Cantu, R. C., Shenton, M., Lin, A. P., Nowinski, C. J., McKee, A. C., & Stern, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Stern, Robert A.
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2011-12
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
525-531
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319691314
Cited by
101
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG013846, P30-AG13846))
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS078337)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
chronic traumatic encephalopathy, traumatic brain injury, clinical criteria, cognitive impairment, memory, executive dysfunction, mood disorders, depression, suicidality, personality and behavior, parkinsonism, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging, neuropsychological assessment, preclinical detection, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Neurologic Examination, Neuropsychological Tests, Biomarkers, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Brain Injury, Chronic, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review