Cited by 87Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Evidence for the Specificity of Intracortical Inhibitory Dysfunction in Asymptomatic Concussed Athletes

Tremblay, Sara, de Beaumont, Louis, Lassonde, Maryse, Théoret, Hugo·2011·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Sports concussions affect thousands of individuals every year and are a major public health concern. Still, little is known about the long-term and cumulative effects of concussions on brain neurophysiology. The principal objective of this study was to investigate the long-lasting effects of multiple sports concussions on sensorimotor integration and somatosensory processing in a sample of 12 concussed athletes and 14 non-concussed athletes of similar age (mean, 23 years) and education (mean, 16 years). Right median nerve stimulation was paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the left primary motor cortex to investigate sensorimotor integration with short latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and long latency afferent inhibition (LAI) at five interstimulus intervals (18, 20, 22, 100, 200 msec). Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were recorded from the left centro-parietal region. We also investigated primary motor cortex inhibitory mechanisms with three TMS protocols: cortical silent period, long interval intracortical inhibition, and short interval intracortical inhibition. Motor evoked potentials were recorded from the right abductor pollicis brevis muscle. No differences were observed between groups for SAI, LAI, and SEP. However, cortical silent period duration was prolonged and long interval intracortical inhibition was enhanced in the concussed group. These findings suggest that multiple sports concussions lead to specific, long-term neurophysiological dy…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2010.1615

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tremblay, S., de Beaumont, L., Lassonde, M., & Théoret, H.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA)
  • McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Corresponding author
Théoret, Hugo
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2011-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
493-502
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W2157467604
Cited by
86
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
sports-related concussion, multiple concussions, intracortical inhibition, primary motor cortex, cortical silent period, long-interval intracortical inhibition, short-interval intracortical inhibition, short-latency afferent inhibition, sensorimotor integration, somatosensory processing, GABAB receptors, asymptomatic athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Athletic Injuries, Brain Concussion, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Humans, Male, Median Nerve, Motor Cortex, Neural Conduction, Neural Inhibition, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review