Cited by 140Computational Drug Discovery MethodsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking Drug Repositioning and Development with Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Omics

Open access
Koromina, Maria, Pandi, Maria-Theodora, Patrinos, George P.·2019·OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology

Abstract

Abstract Pharmaceutical industry and the art and science of drug development are sorely in need of novel transformative technologies in the current age of digital health and artificial intelligence (AI). Often described as game-changing technologies, AI and machine learning algorithms have slowly but surely begun to revolutionize pharmaceutical industry and drug development over the past 5 years. In this expert review, we describe the most frequently used machine learning algorithms in drug development pipelines and the -omics databases well poised to support machine learning and drug discovery. Subsequently, we analyze the emerging new computational approaches to drug discovery and the in silico pipelines for drug repositioning and the synergies among -omics system sciences, AI and machine learning. As with system sciences, AI and machine learning embody a system scale and Big Data driven vision for drug discovery and development. We conclude with a future outlook on the ways in which machine learning approaches can be implemented to buttress and expedite drug discovery and precision medicine. As AI and machine learning are rapidly entering pharmaceutical industry and the art and science of drug development, we need to critically examine the attendant prospects and challenges to benefit patients and public health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/omi.2019.0151

Cites

74 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Azuaje F. (2017). Computational models for predicting drug responses in cancer research. Brief Bioinform, 18, 820–829.
  2. Jang IS, , Neto EC, , Guinney J, , Friend SH, , and Margolin AA. (2014). Systematic assessment of analytical methods for drug sensitivity prediction from cancer cell line data. Pac Symp Biocomput, 2014:63–74.
  3. Kuo M.-H, , Kushniruk A, , Borycki EM, , and Greig D. (2009). Application of the Apriori algorithm for adverse drug reaction detection. Stud Health Technol Inform, 148, 95–101.
  4. Neto EC, , Jang IS, , Friend S. H, , and Margolin AA. (2014). The Stream algorithm: Computationally efficient ridge-regression via Bayesian model averaging, and applications to pharmacogenomic prediction of cancer cell line sensitivity. Pac Symp Biocomput, 2014, 27–38.
  5. Nguyen L, , Dang C, , and Ballester PJ. (2016). Systematic assessment of multi-gene predictors of pan-cancer cell line sensitivity to drugs exploiting gene expression data. F1000Research, 5, ISCB Comm. J-2927.
  6. Zhao K, , and So H. (2017). A machine learning approach to drug repositioning based on drug expression profiles: Applications to schizophrenia and depression/anxiety disorders. arXiv
  7. Zou J, , Zheng M.-W, , Li G, , and Su Z.-G. (2013). Advanced systems biology methods in drug discovery and translational biomedicine. Biomed Res Int, 2013, 1–8. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Koromina, M., Pandi, M.-T., & Patrinos, G. P.
Affiliations
University of Patras (GR)
Corresponding author
Patrinos, George P.
Venue
OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology
Published
2019-11
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
539-548
ISSN
  • 1536-2310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8100
OpenAlex
W2981458781
Cited by
140
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
drug repurposing, drug development, artificial intelligence, machine learning, omics databases, computational drug discovery, precision medicine, big data, pharmaceutical industry
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Models, Theoretical, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Genomics, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review