The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Efficient Method for Generation of Knockout Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9 System
Abstract
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) represent a promising tool to study functions of genes during development, to model diseases, and to even develop therapies when combined with gene editing techniques such as CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein-9 nuclease (Cas9) system. However, the process of disruption of gene expression by generation of null alleles is often inefficient and tedious. To circumvent these limitations, we developed a simple and efficient protocol to permanently downregulate expression of a gene of interest in hESCs using CRISPR/Cas9. We selected p53 for our proof of concept experiments. The methodology is based on series of hESC transfection, which leads to efficient downregulation of p53 expression even in polyclonal population (p53 Low cells), here proven by a loss of regulation of the expression of p53 target gene, microRNA miR-34a. We demonstrate that our approach achieves over 80% efficiency in generating hESC clonal sublines that do not express p53 protein. Importantly, we document by a set of functional experiments that such genetically modified hESCs do retain typical stem cells characteristics. In summary, we provide a simple and robust protocol to efficiently target expression of gene of interest in hESCs that can be useful for laboratories aiming to employ gene editing in their hESC applications/protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These include the possibilities of limited on-target editing efficiency38,39, incomplete editing (mosaicism)40,41, and inaccurate on- or off-target editing42,43.”
From CRISPR Ethics: Moral Considerations for Applications of a Powerful Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1126/science.1231143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.stem.2013.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2808 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkt555 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2647 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00006-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1318 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5966/sctm.2012-0081 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1310 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature05939 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.028 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3536 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.16270 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201604054 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201604081 · DOI
Cited by
CRISPR Ethics: Moral Considerations for Applications of a Powerful Tool
Brokowski, C., & Adli, M. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.044 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Bohaciakova, D., Renzova, T., Fedorova, V., Barak, M., Kunova Bosakova, M., Hampl, A., & Cajanek, L.
- Affiliations
- Masaryk University
- Venue
- Stem Cells and Development
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1521-1527
- ISSN
- 1547-3287
- 1557-8534
- PMC
- PMC6328014
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Efficient Method for Generation of Knockout Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9 System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/scd.2017.0058
- The paper
- Bohaciakova, D., Renzova, T., Fedorova, V., Barak, M., Kunova Bosakova, M., Hampl, A., & Cajanek, L. (2017). An Efficient Method for Generation of Knockout Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9 System. Stem Cells and Development. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2017.0058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.