Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dose Effect of Dual Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 on Bone Regeneration in a Rat Critical-Size Defect Model

Open access
Young, Simon, Patel, Zarana S., Kretlow, James D., Murphy, Matthew B., Mountziaris, Paschalia M., Baggett, L. Scott, Ueda, Hiroki, Tabata, Yasuhiko, Jansen, John A., Wong, Mark, Mikos, Antonios G.·2009·Tissue Engineering Part A

Abstract

The dose effect of dual delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) on bone regeneration was investigated in a rat cranial critical-size defect (CSD). It was hypothesized that decreasing amounts of BMP-2 would result in a dose-dependent decrease in bone formation, and that this reduction in bone formation could be reversed by adding increasing amounts of VEGF. In vitro release kinetics of VEGF or BMP-2 were examined over 28 days. Next, scaffolds were implanted within a rat cranial CSD containing different combinations of both BMP-2 and VEGF. At 12 weeks, samples were analyzed using microcomputed tomography and histology. In vitro , VEGF and BMP-2 exhibited burst release in the first 24 h followed by a significant decrease in release rate over 27 days. Overall, BMP-2 had a more sustained release versus VEGF. An in vivo dose-dependent decrease in percentage of bone fill (PBF) was observed for BMP-2. The addition of VEGF was unable to reverse this decrease in PBF, although improvements in the number of bridged defects did occur in some groups. This suggests that for this particular model simultaneous release of BMP-2 and VEGF does not increase bone formation over BMP-2 alone at 12 weeks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0510

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Young, S., Patel, Z. S., Kretlow, J. D., Murphy, M. B., Mountziaris, P. M., Baggett, L. S., Ueda, H., Tabata, Y., Jansen, J. A., Wong, M., & Mikos, A. G.
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part A
Published
2009-02-24
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
2347-2362
ISSN
  • 1937-3341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-335X
OpenAlex
W1976661118
Cited by
255
References
1
FWCI
13.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose Effect of Dual Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 on Bone Regeneration in a Rat Critical-Size Defect Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0510
The paper
Young, S., Patel, Z. S., Kretlow, J. D., Murphy, M. B., Mountziaris, P. M., Baggett, L. S., Ueda, H., Tabata, Y., Jansen, J. A., Wong, M., & Mikos, A. G. (2009). Dose Effect of Dual Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 on Bone Regeneration in a Rat Critical-Size Defect Model. Tissue Engineering Part A. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0510

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.