The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering Orthopedic Tissue Interfaces
Open accessAbstract
While a wide variety of approaches to engineering orthopedic tissues have been proposed, less attention has been paid to the interfaces, the specialized areas that connect two tissues of different biochemical and mechanical properties. The interface tissue plays an important role in transitioning mechanical load between disparate tissues. Thus, the relatively new field of interfacial tissue engineering presents new challenges—to not only consider the regeneration of individual orthopedic tissues, but also to design the biochemical and cellular composition of the linking tissue. Approaches to interfacial tissue engineering may be distinguished based on if the goal is to recreate the interface itself, or generate an entire integrated tissue unit (such as an osteochondral plug). As background for future efforts in engineering orthopedic interfaces, a brief review of the biology and mechanics of each interface (cartilage–bone, ligament–bone, meniscus–bone, and muscle–tendon) is presented, followed by an overview of the state-of-the-art in engineering each tissue, including advances and challenges specific to regenerating the interfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Altman, G. H., Diaz, F., Jakuba, C., Calabro, T., Horan, R. L., Chen, J., Lu, H., Richmond, J., & Kaplan, D. L. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00353-8 · Cited by 3,458
Martin, R. B., Burr, D. B., Sharkey, N. A., & Fyhrie, D. P. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3002-9 · Cited by 1,159
Ligament tissue engineering: An evolutionary materials science approach
Laurencin, C. T., & Freeman, J. W. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.073 · Cited by 304
Injury and repair of the musculoskeletal soft tissues. Savannah, Georgia, June 18–20, 1987
Woo, S. L., & Buckwalter, J. A. (1988) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100060615 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Bone Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and Challenges
Amini, A. R., Laurencin, C. T., & Nukavarapu, S. P. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v40.i5.10 · Cited by 2,336
Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration
Vo, T. N., Kasper, F. K., & Mikos, A. G. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016 · Cited by 666
Functional Attachment of Soft Tissues to Bone: Development, Healing, and Tissue Engineering
Lu, H. H., & Thomopoulos, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124656 · Cited by 447
A 3D bioprinted complex structure for engineering the muscle–tendon unit
Merceron, T. K., Burt, M., Seol, Y.-J., Kang, H.-W., Lee, S. J., Yoo, J. J., & Atala, A. (2015) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035003 · Cited by 373
Chen, J., Chen, H., Li, P., Diao, H., Zhu, S., Dong, L., Wang, R., Guo, T., Zhao, J., & Zhang, J. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.041 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, P. J., & Temenoff, J. S.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-141
- ISSN
- 1937-3368 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-3376
- OpenAlex
- W2038641983
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering Orthopedic Tissue Interfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0371
- The paper
- Yang, P. J., & Temenoff, J. S. (2009). Engineering Orthopedic Tissue Interfaces. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.