Cited by 611Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsCollagen: Extraction and Characterization3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Review of Collagen I Hydrogels for Bioengineered Tissue Microenvironments: Characterization of Mechanics, Structure, and Transport

Open access
Antoine, Elizabeth E., Vlachos, Pavlos P., Rylander, Marissa Nichole·2014·Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews

Abstract

Type I collagen hydrogels have been used successfully as three-dimensional substrates for cell culture and have shown promise as scaffolds for engineered tissues and tumors. A critical step in the development of collagen hydrogels as viable tissue mimics is quantitative characterization of hydrogel properties and their correlation with fabrication parameters, which enables hydrogels to be tuned to match specific tissues or fulfill engineering requirements. A significant body of work has been devoted to characterization of collagen I hydrogels; however, due to the breadth of materials and techniques used for characterization, published data are often disjoint and hence their utility to the community is reduced. This review aims to determine the parameter space covered by existing data and identify key gaps in the literature so that future characterization and use of collagen I hydrogels for research can be most efficiently conducted. This review is divided into three sections: (1) relevant fabrication parameters are introduced and several of the most popular methods of controlling and regulating them are described, (2) hydrogel properties most relevant for tissue engineering are presented and discussed along with their characterization techniques, (3) the state of collagen I hydrogel characterization is recapitulated and future directions are proposed. Ultimately, this review can serve as a resource for selection of fabrication parameters and material characterization methodologies in order to increase the usefulness of future collagen-hydrogel-based characterization studies and tissue engineering experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.0086

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. [1]Kumar V., Brewster L., Caves J., and Chaikof E.Tissue engineering of blood vessels: functional requirements, progress, and future challenges. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2,137, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Ingram M., Techy G.B., Ward B.R., Imam S.A., Atkinson R., Ho H., et al. Tissue engineered tumor models. Biotech Histochem 85,213, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Sung J.H., and Shuler M.L.Microtechnology for mimicking in vivo tissue environment. Ann Biomed Eng 40,1289, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Buchanan C., and Rylander M.N.Microfluidic culture models to study the hydrodynamics of tumor progression and therapeutic response. Biotechnol Bioeng 110,2063, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Tibbitt M.W., and Anseth K.S.Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 103,655, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Fischbach C., Chen R., Matsumoto T., Schmelzle T., Brugge J.S., Polverini P.J., et al Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds. Nat Methods 4,855, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Kloxin A.M., Kloxin C.J., Bowman C.N., and Anseth K.S.Mechanical properties of cellularly responsive hydrogels and their experimental determination. Adv Mater 22,3484, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Hoffman A.S.Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54,3, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]Aurand E.R., Lampe K.J., and Bjugstad K.B.Defining and designing polymers and hydrogels for neural tissue engineering. Neurosci Res 72,199, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]Drury J.L., and Mooney D.J.Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24,4337, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]Parenteau-Bareil R., Gauvin R., and Berthod F.Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials 3,1863, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Kreger S.T., Bell B.J., Bailey J., Stites E., Kuske J., Waisner B., et al. Polymerization and matrix physical properties as important design considerations for soluble collagen formulations. Biopolymers 93,690, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Yamamura N., Sudo R., Ikeda M., and Tanishita K.Effects of the mechanical properties of collagen gel on the in vitro formation of microvessel networks by endothelial cells. Tissue Eng 13,1443, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [14]Abraham L.C., Zuena E., Perez-Ramirez B., and Kaplan D.L.Guide to collagen characterization for biomaterial studies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 87B,264, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [15]Charulatha V., and Rajaram A.Influence of different crosslinking treatments on the physical properties of collagen membranes. Biomaterials 24,759, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [16]Ulrich T.A., Jain A., Tanner K., MacKay J.L., and Kumar S.Probing cellular mechanobiology in three-dimensional culture with collagen-agarose matrices. Biomaterials 31,1875, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [17]Gribova V., Crouzier T., and Picart C.A material's point of view on recent developments of polymeric biomaterials: control of mechanical and biochemical properties. J Mater Chem 21,14354, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [18]Levy-Mishali M., Zoldan J., and Levenberg S.Effect of scaffold stiffness on myoblast differentiation. Tissue Eng Part A 15,935, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. [19]Ramanujan S., Pluen A., McKee T.D., Brown E.B., Boucher Y., and Jain R.K.Diffusion and convection in collagen gels: implications for transport in the tumor interstitium. Biophys J 83,1650, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [20]Wolf K., Alexander S., Schacht V., Coussens L.M., von Andrian U.H., van Rheenen J., et al. Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. Sem Cell Dev Biol 20,931, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [21]Stuart K., and Panitch A.Influence of chondroitin sulfate on collagen gel structure and mechanical properties at physiologically relevant levels. Biopolymers 89,841, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [22]Gronau G., Krishnaji S.T., Kinahan M.E., Giesa T., Wong J.Y., Kaplan D.L., et al. A review of combined experimental and computational procedures for assessing biopolymer structure-process-property relationships. Biomaterials 33,8240, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [24]Billiet T., Vandenhaute M., Schelfhout J., Van Vlierberghe S., and Dubruel P.A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33,6020, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. [25]Miller E.J., and Rhodes R.K.Preparation and characterization of the different types of collagen. Methods Enzymol 82Pt A,33, 1982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. [26]Raub C.B., Suresh V., Krasieva T., Lyubovitsky J., Mih J.D., Putnam A.J., et al. Noninvasive assessment of collagen gel microstructure and mechanics using multiphoton microscopy. Biophys J 92,2212, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. [27]Erikson A., Andersen H.N., Naess S.N., Sikorski P., and Davies Cde L.Physical and chemical modifications of collagen gels: impact on diffusion. Biopolymers 89,135, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. [28]Saddiq Z.A., Barbenel J.C., and Grant M.H.The mechanical strength of collagen gels containing glycosaminoglycans and populated with fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A 89,697, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. [29]Wolf K., Muller R., Borgmann S., Brocker E.B., and Friedl P.Amoeboid shape change and contact guidance: T-lymphocyte crawling through fibrillar collagen is independent of matrix remodeling by MMPs and other proteases. Blood 102,3262, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. [30]Sheu M.T., Huang J.C., Yeh G.C., and Ho H.O.Characterization of collagen gel solutions and collagen matrices for cell culture. Biomaterials 22,1713, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. [31]Lu P., Takai K., Weaver V.M., and Werb Z.Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3,a005058, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. [32]Baaijens F., Bouten C., and Driessen N.Modeling collagen remodeling. J Biomech 43,166, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. [33]Kadler K.E., Baldock C., Bella J., and Boot-Handford R.P.Collagens at a glance. J Cell Sci 120,1955, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. [34]Raub C.B., Unruh J., Suresh V., Krasieva T., Lindmo T., Gratton E., et al. Image correlation spectroscopy of multiphoton images correlates with collagen mechanical properties. Biophys J 94,2361, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. [35]Achilli M., and Mantovani D.Tailoring mechanical properties of collagen-based scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering: the effects of pH, temperature and ionic strength on gelation. Polymers 2,664, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  35. [36]Gentleman E., Lay A.N., Dickerson D.A., Nauman E.A., Livesay G.A., and Dee K.C.Mechanical characterization of collagen fibers and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24,3805, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. [37]Parenteau-Bareil R., Gauvin R., Cliche S., Gariepy C., Germain L., and Berthod F.Comparative study of bovine, porcine and avian collagens for the production of a tissue engineered dermis. Acta Biomater 7,3757, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. [38]Gelman R.A., Poppke D.C., and Piez K.A.Collagen fibril formation in vitro. The role of the nonhelical terminal regions. J Biol Chem 254,11741, 1979 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. [39]Walters B.D., and Stegemann J.P.Strategies for directing the structure and function of three-dimensional collagen biomaterials across length scales. Acta Biomater 10,1488, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. [40]Carey S.P., Kraning-Rush C.M., Williams R.M., and Reinhart-King C.A.Biophysical control of invasive tumor cell behavior by extracellular matrix microarchitecture. Biomaterials 33,4157, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. [41]Miron-Mendoza M., Seemann J., and Grinnell F.The differential regulation of cell motile activity through matrix stiffness and porosity in three dimensional collagen matrices. Biomaterials 31,6425, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. [42]Zaman M.H., Trapani L.M., Sieminski A.L., Mackellar D., Gong H., Kamm R.D., et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103,10889, 2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. [43]Chrobak K.M., Potter D.R., and Tien J.Formation of perfused, functional microvascular tubes in vitro. Microvasc Res 71,185, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. [44]Cross V.L., Zheng Y., Won Choi N., Verbridge S.S., Sutermaster B.A., Bonassar L.J., et al. Dense type I collagen matrices that support cellular remodeling and microfabrication for studies of tumor angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in vitro. Biomaterials 31,8596, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. [45]Marotta M., and Martino G.Sensitive spectrophotometric method for the quantitative estimation of collagen. Anal Biochem 150,86, 1985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. [46]Rodriguez-Rodriguez P., Arribas S.M., de Pablo A.L., Gonzalez M.C., Abderrahim F., and Condezo-Hoyos L.A simple dot-blot-Sirius red-based assay for collagen quantification. Anal Bioanal Chem 405,6863, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. [47]Yang Y.L., Motte S., and Kaufman L.J.Pore size variable type I collagen gels and their interaction with glioma cells. Biomaterials 31,5678, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. [48]Leung A.D., Wong K.H., and Tien J.Plasma expanders stabilize human microvessels in microfluidic scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 100,1815, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. [49]Gillette B.M., Jensen J.A., Wang M., Tchao J., and Sia S.K.Dynamic hydrogels: switching of 3D microenvironments using two-component naturally derived extracellular matrices. Adv Mater 22,686, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. [50]Gobeaux F., Mosser G., Anglo A., Panine P., Davidson P., Giraud-Guille M.M., et al. Fibrillogenesis in dense collagen solutions: a physicochemical study. J Mol Biol 376,1509, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. [51]Chung S., Sudo R., Mack P.J., Wan C.R., Vickerman V., and Kamm R.D.Cell migration into scaffolds under co-culture conditions in a microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 9,269, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. [53]Knapp D.M., Barocas V.H., Moon A.G., Yoo K., Petzold L.R., and Tranquillo R.T.Rheology of reconstituted type I collagen gel in confined compression. J Rheol 41,971, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  52. [54]Kuntz R.M., and Saltzman W.M.Neutrophil motility in extracellular matrix gels: mesh size and adhesion affect speed of migration. Biophys J 72,1472, 1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. [55]Lake S.P., and Barocas V.H.Mechanical and structural contribution of non-fibrillar matrix in uniaxial tension: a collagen-agarose co-gel model. Ann Biomed Eng 39,1891, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. [56]Krishnan L., Weiss J.A., Wessman M.D., and Hoying J.B.Design and application of a test system for viscoelastic characterization of collagen gels. Tissue Eng 10,241, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. [57]Polacheck W.J., Charest J.L., and Kamm R.D.Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108,11115, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. [58]Provenzano P.P., Inman D.R., Eliceiri K.W., Knittel J.G., Yan L., Rueden C.T., et al. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med 6,11, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. [59]Raeber G.P., Lutolf M.P., and Hubbell J.A.Molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels: a novel model system for proteolytically mediated cell migration. Biophys J 89,1374, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. [60]Roeder B.A., Kokini K., and Voytik-Harbin S.L.Fibril microstructure affects strain transmission within collagen extracellular matrices. J Biomech Eng 131,031004, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. [61]Song J.W., and Munn L.L.Fluid forces control endothelial sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108,15342, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. [62]Sundararaghavan H.G., Monteiro G.A., Firestein B.L., and Shreiber D.I.Neurite growth in 3D collagen gels with gradients of mechanical properties. Biotechnol Bioeng 102,632, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. [63]Shreiber D.I., Enever P.A., and Tranquillo R.T.Effects of pdgf-bb on rat dermal fibroblast behavior in mechanically stressed and unstressed collagen and fibrin gels. Exp Cell Res 266,155, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. [64]Brightman A.O., Rajwa B.P., Sturgis J.E., McCallister M.E., Robinson J.P., and Voytik-Harbin S.L.Time-lapse confocal reflection microscopy of collagen fibrillogenesis and extracellular matrix assembly in vitro. Biopolymers 54,222, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. [65]Chandran P.L., and Barocas V.H.Microstructural mechanics of collagen gels in confined compression: poroelasticity, viscoelasticity, and collapse. J Biomech Eng 126,152, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. [66]Whittington C.F., Yoder M.C., and Voytik-Harbin S.L.Collagen-polymer guidance of vessel network formation and stabilization by endothelial colony forming cells in vitro. Macromol Biosci 13,1135, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. [68]Ng C.P., Hinz B., and Swartz M.A.Interstitial fluid flow induces myofibroblast differentiation and collagen alignment in vitro. J Cell Sci 118,4731, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. [69]Ng C.P., and Swartz M.A.Fibroblast alignment under interstitial fluid flow using a novel 3-D tissue culture model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284,H1771, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. [70]Saltzman W.M., Parkhurst M.R., Parsons-Wingerter P., and Zhu W.H.Three-dimensional cell cultures mimic tissues. Ann N Y Acad Sci 665,259, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. [71]Sun S., Wise J., and Cho M.Human fibroblast migration in three-dimensional collagen gel in response to noninvasive electrical stimulus. I. Characterization of induced three-dimensional cell movement. Tissue Eng 10,1548, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. [72]Guarnieri D., Battista S., Borzacchiello A., Mayol L., De Rosa E., Keene D.R., et al. Effects of fibronectin and laminin on structural, mechanical and transport properties of 3D collageneous network. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18,245, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. [74]Gunzer M., Friedl P., Niggemann B., Brocker E.B., Kampgen E., and Zanker K.S.Migration of dendritic cells within 3-D collagen lattices is dependent on tissue origin, state of maturation, and matrix structure and is maintained by proinflammatory cytokines. J Leukoc Biol 67,622, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. [75]Friedl P., Maaser K., Klein C.E., Niggemann B., Krohne G., and Zanker K.S.Migration of highly aggressive MV3 melanoma cells in 3-dimensional collagen lattices results in local matrix reorganization and shedding of alpha2 and beta1 integrins and CD44. Cancer Res 57,2061, 1997 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. [76]Bailey J.L., Critser P.J., Whittington C., Kuske J.L., Yoder M.C., and Voytik-Harbin S.L.Collagen oligomers modulate physical and biological properties of three-dimensional self-assembled matrices. Biopolymers 95,77, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. [77]Sieminski A.L., Hebbel R.P., and Gooch K.J.The relative magnitudes of endothelial force generation and matrix stiffness modulate capillary morphogenesis in vitro. Exp Cell Res 297,574, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. [78]Stylianopoulos T., Poh M.Z., Insin N., Bawendi M.G., Fukumura D., Munn L.L., et al. Diffusion of particles in the extracellular matrix: the effect of repulsive electrostatic interactions. Biophys J 99,1342, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. [79]Williams B.R., Gelman R.A., Poppke D.C., and Piez K.A.Collagen fibril formation. Optimal in vitro conditions and preliminary kinetic results. J Biol Chem 253,6578, 1978 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. [80]Sung K.E., Su G., Pehlke C., Trier S.M., Eliceiri K.W., Keely P.J., et al. Control of 3-dimensional collagen matrix polymerization for reproducible human mammary fibroblast cell culture in microfluidic devices. Biomaterials 30,4833, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. [82]Lo C.M., Wang H.B., Dembo M., and Wang Y.L.Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J 79,144, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. [83]Paszek M.J., Zahir N., Johnson K.R., Lakins J.N., Rozenberg G.I., Gefen A., et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8,241, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. [84]Brandl F., Sommer F., and Goepferich A.Rational design of hydrogels for tissue engineering: impact of physical factors on cell behavior. Biomaterials 28,134, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. [85]Haugh M.G., Murphy C.M., McKiernan R.C., Altenbuchner C., and O'Brien F.J.Crosslinking and mechanical properties significantly influence cell attachment, proliferation, and migration within collagen glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 17,1201, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. [87]Polacheck W.J., Zervantonakis I.K., and Kamm R.D.Tumor cell migration in complex microenvironments. Cell Mol Life Sci 70,1335, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. [88]Saunders R.L., and Hammer D.A.Assembly of human umbilical vein endothelial cells on compliant hydrogels. Cell Mol Bioeng 3,60, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. [89]Califano J.P., and Reinhart-King C.A.A balance of substrate mechanics and matrix chemistry regulates endothelial cell network assembly. Cell Mol Bioeng 1,122, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  84. [90]Levental I., Georges P.C., and Janmey P.A.Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. Soft Matter 3,299, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. [91]Wells R.G.The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology 47,1394, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. [92]Evans D.W., Vavalle N.A., DeVita R., Rajagopalan P., and Sparks J.L.Nano-indentation device for investigating the mechanics of compliant materials. Exp Mech 53,217, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  87. [93]Thiele J., Ma Y., Bruekers S.M., Ma S., and Huck W.T.25th Anniversary article: designer hydrogels for cell cultures: a materials selection guide. Adv Mater 26,125, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. [94]Leddy H.A., Haider M.A., and Guilak F.Diffusional anisotropy in collagenous tissues: fluorescence imaging of continuous point photobleaching. Biophys J 91,311, 2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. [95]Seiffert S., and Oppermann W.Systematic evaluation of FRAP experiments performed in a confocal laser scanning microscope. J Microsc 220,20, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. [96]Berk D.A., Yuan F., Leunig M., and Jain R.K.Fluorescence photobleaching with spatial Fourier analysis: measurement of diffusion in light-scattering media. Biophys J 65,2428, 1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. [97]Taylor J.M., Cohen S., and Mitchell W.M.Epidermal growth factor: high and low molecular weight forms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 67,164, 1970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. [98]Mcinnes I.Cytokines. In: Firestein G.S., Kelley W.N., eds., Kelley's textbook of rheumatology. 8th ed., Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  93. [99]Huang Y.C., Wang T.W., Sun J.S., and Lin F.H.Epidermal morphogenesis in an in-vitro model using a fibroblasts-embedded collagen scaffold. J Biomed Sci 12,855, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. [100]Chandrakasan G., Torchia D.A., and Piez K.A.Preparation of intact monomeric collagen from rat tail tendon and skin and the structure of the nonhelical ends in solution. J Biol Chem 251,6062, 1976 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antoine, E. E., Vlachos, P. P., & Rylander, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Antoine, Elizabeth E.
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Published
2014-12
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
683-696
ISSN
  • 1937-3368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-3376
OpenAlex
W2325212255
Cited by
611
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0955072, CAREER)
  • National Cancer Institute (IR21CA158454-01A1)
  • Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
collagen I hydrogel, hydrogel characterization, tissue engineering scaffolds, fabrication parameters, hydrogel mechanics, hydrogel structure, mass transfer, 3D cell culture, tissue mimics, tumor models
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Humans, Hydrogels, Tissue Engineering, Collagen Type I, Mechanical Phenomena, Cellular Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review