Cited by 95Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineNerve injury and regeneration

Alginate Composition Effects on a Neural Stem Cell–Seeded Scaffold

Open access
Purcell, Erin K., Singh, Aparna, Kipke, Daryl R.·2009·Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of alginate composition on the neurotrophic factor release, viability, and proliferation of encapsulated neural stem cells (NSCs), as well as on the mechanical stability of the scaffold itself. Four compositions were tested: a high guluronic acid (68%) and a high mannuronic acid (54%) content alginate, with or without a poly-L-lysine (PLL) coating layer. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to quantify the release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial-derived neurotrophic factor, and nerve growth factor from the encapsulated cells. All three factors were detected from encapsulated cells only when a high L-guluronic acid alginate without PLL was used. Additionally, capsules with this composition remained intact more frequently when exposed to solutions of low osmolarity, potentially indicating superior mechanical stability. Alginate beads with a PLL-coated, high D-mannuronic acid composition were the most prone to breakage in the osmotic pressure test, and were too fragile for histology and proliferation assays after 1 week in vitro. NSCs survived and proliferated in the three remaining alginate compositions similarly over the 21-day study course irrespective of scaffold condition. NSC-seeded alginate beads with a high L-guluronic acid, non-PLL-coated composition may be useful in the repair of injured nervous tissue, where the mechanism is the secretion of neuroprotective factors. We verify the neuroprotective effects of medium conditioned by NSC-seeded alginate beads on the serum withdrawal-mediated death of PC-12 cells here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0302

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hydrogel scaffolding with neural stem cells produced an initial benefit to surrounding neuronal density within the first week of transplantation.

    “In the case of hydrogel scaffolding, an initial benefit to surrounding neuronal density was noted within the first week of transplantation, which may be related to release of neurotrophic factors by the engrafted cells.89”

    From Regenerative Electrode Interfaces for Neural Prostheses. (2016) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Discussion reports that alginate-encapsulated neural stem cells secrete neurotrophic factors, and Figure 4 reports a protective effect of their conditioned medium on cultured PC-12 cells. The paper does not report transplantation or a change in surrounding neuronal density within the first week; it describes testing the scaffolded cells’ ability to repair nervous tissue as future work. The proposed mechanism is supported, but the claimed transplant outcome is not. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Purcell, E. K., Singh, A., & Kipke, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods
Published
2009-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
541-550
ISSN
  • 1937-3384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-3392
OpenAlex
W2069824861
Cited by
95
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering Part C Methods (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB002030)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
alginate, neural stem cells, guluronic acid, mannuronic acid, poly-L-lysine coating, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, nerve growth factor, encapsulated cells, osmotic pressure, cell viability and proliferation, neuroprotection, serum deprivation, PC12 cells
MeSH terms
Alginates, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cell Survival, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Hexuronic Acids, Immunohistochemistry, Intermediate Filament Proteins, Microspheres, Nerve Growth Factors, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Stem Cells, PC12 Cells, Culture Media, Conditioned, Glucuronic Acid, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds, Nestin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review