The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Features Associated with an Increased Risk of Thyroid Malignancy in Patients with Follicular Neoplasia by Fine-Needle Aspiration
Abstract
The application of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to the evaluation of the thyroid nodule has greatly enhanced the ability of the clinician to appropriately select patients for thyroidectomy. However, despite extensive experience with thyroid FNA, the cytological distinction of benign from malignant follicular neoplasia remains problematic. As a result, most patients with FNA findings of a follicular neoplasm are referred for thyroidectomy. The goal of the present study was to develop clinical criteria capable of predicting malignancy in patients with an FNA diagnosis of follicular neoplasm. Among 1121 patients undergoing thyroid FNA at two large teaching centers during the period 1990 to 1995, 149 patients had cytological findings consistent with a follicular neoplasm. Among 103 patients referred for thyroidectomy, 22 (21%) were found to have a malignancy in the biopsied nodule. Among patients subjected to thyroidectomy, the risk of malignancy was significantly higher when follicular neoplasia was present in a male (43% vs. 16% for females, p = 0.007), when the nodule was greater than 4 cm to palpation (40% vs. 13% for nodules less than 4 cm, p = 0.03), or when the nodule was judged to be solitary by palpation (25% vs. 6% for a dominant nodule in a multinodular goiter, p = 0.02). Bayesian analysis of the data reveals that after an FNA showing a follicular neoplasm, the risk of malignancy in males with large nodules was nearly 80%, compared with a rate of only 3% in females with small nodules. These results suggest that clinical features including gender, nodule size, and character of the gland by palpation can be systematically integrated into the decision analysis, thereby improving the selection of patients for surgical referral.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Diamond, G. A., & Forrester, J. S. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197906143002402 · Cited by 2,664
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Self-citationCooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
Self-citationBartolazzi, A., Gasbarri, A., Papotti, M., Bussolati, G., Lucante, T., Khan, A., Inohara, H., Marandino, F., Orlandi, F., Nardi, F., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04817-0 · Cited by 409
Follicular-Patterned Lesions of the Thyroid: The Bane of the Pathologist
Baloch, Z. W., & LiVolsi, V. A. (2002) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/8vl9-ecxy-nvmx-2rqf · Cited by 266
Davis, S. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.21.2600 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- TUTTLE, R. M., LEMAR, H., & BURCH, H. B.
- Venue
- Thyroid
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 377-383
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W2035919693
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Features Associated with an Increased Risk of Thyroid Malignancy in Patients with Follicular Neoplasia by Fine-Needle Aspiration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.1998.8.377
- The paper
- TUTTLE, R. M., LEMAR, H., & BURCH, H. B. (1998). Clinical Features Associated with an Increased Risk of Thyroid Malignancy in Patients with Follicular Neoplasia by Fine-Needle Aspiration. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.1998.8.377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.