Cited by 22Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsOphthalmology and Eye DisordersThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

The Natural History of Subclinical Hyperthyroidism in Graves’ Disease: The Rule of Thirds

Open access
Zhyzhneuskaya, Sviatlana, Addison, Caroline, Tsatlidis, Vasileios, Weaver, Jolanta U., Razvi, Salman·2016·Thyroid

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little information regarding the natural history of subclinical hyperthyroidism (SH) due to Graves' disease (GD). METHODS: A prospective analysis was conducted of patients with SH due to GD between 2007 and 2013 with at least 12 months of follow-up. SH was diagnosed if serum thyrotropin (TSH) was below the laboratory reference range (0.4-4.0 mIU/L) and when thyroid hormones were normal. GD was confirmed by either a raised TSH receptor antibody (TRAb) level or uniform uptake on Technetium scan. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (89% female, 16% current smokers, and 5% with active Graves' orbitopathy) were diagnosed with SH due to GD. Over the follow-up period (median 32 months), approximately one third (34%) of the cohort progressed to overt hyperthyroidism, one third (34%) normalized their thyroid function, slightly less than one third (30%) remained in the SH state, while one person became hypothyroid. Multivariate regression analysis showed that older age and positive antithyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibody status had a positive association with risk of progression to overt hyperthyroidism, with hazard ratios of 1.06 ([confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.10], p < 0.01) per year and 10.15 ([CI 1.83-56.23], p < 0.01), respectively, independent of other risk factors including, smoking, TRAb levels at diagnosis, and sex. CONCLUSIONS: A third each of patients with SH due to GD progress, normalize, or remain in the SH state. Older people and those with positive anti-TPO antibodies have a higher risk of progression of the disease. These novel data need to be verified and confirmed in larger cohorts and over longer periods of follow-up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.2015.0470

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhyzhneuskaya, S., Addison, C., Tsatlidis, V., Weaver, J. U., & Razvi, S.
Affiliations
Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Razvi, Salman
Venue
Thyroid
Published
2016-06
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
765-769
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W2358383112
Cited by
22
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thyroid (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
subclinical hyperthyroidism, Graves' disease, natural history (disease), thyroid peroxidase antibodies, age as risk factor, thyroid function normalization, hypothyroidism, TSH receptor antibodies, smoking
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Autoantibodies, Female, Graves Disease, Humans, Hyperthyroidism, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Receptors, Thyrotropin, Severity of Illness Index, Thyroid Function Tests, Disease Progression, Graves Ophthalmopathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review