Cited by 35Clinical practice guidelines implementationThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryHealth Sciences Research and Education

American Thyroid Association Guidelines and Statements: Past, Present, and Future: American Thyroid Association Guidelines Policy and Procedures Task Force

Sawka, Anna M., Carty, Sally E., Haugen, Bryan R., Hennessey, James V., Kopp, Peter A., Pearce, Elizabeth N., Sosa, Julie A., Tufano, Ralph P. +1 more·2018·Thyroid

Abstract

Background The American Thyroid Association (ATA) is continually striving to improve the quality of its publications. The ATA Guidelines Policies and Procedures Task Force was active during 2017. It recently recommended convening a formal standing committee to review and update policies and procedures for the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and Statements on an ongoing basis. Objective This statement reviews the history of official ATA publications and discusses the challenges and findings identified by the Task Force. We also wish to present our "work in progress" and propose future directions for the new ATA Guidelines and Statements Committee (ATA GSC). Methods Our Task Force reviewed the publication record of the ATA with respect to CPGs. We also reviewed existing ATA policies for CPGs and other official statements, examined policies of other organizations, solicited input from external experts and organizations, and convened five conference calls and two in-person meetings. Results The ATA has a rich history of developing official publications that have been influential based on download and citation records as well as changes in practice trends. Key future issues to be further addressed by the ATA GSC include the following: (i) striving to improve the methodologic rigor of development of CPGs while balancing considerations of feasibility and timeliness and the role of transparently communicated expert opinion; (ii) formalizing a framework and process…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.2018.0070

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sawka, A. M., Carty, S. E., Haugen, B. R., Hennessey, J. V., Kopp, P. A., Pearce, E. N., Sosa, J. A., Tufano, R. P., & Jonklaas, J.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sawka, Anna M.
  • Jonklaas, Jacqueline
Venue
Thyroid
Published
2018-06
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
692-706
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W2896524052
Cited by
35
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thyroid (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
American Thyroid Association, guideline development, statements, conflicts of interest, diversity and equity, stakeholder representation, patient representatives, guideline implementation, thyroid dysfunction, expert opinion
MeSH terms
Endocrinology, Humans, Societies, Medical, Thyroid Diseases, Thyroid Gland, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Advisory Committees, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review