Cited by 78Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsAsthma and respiratory diseasesMobile Learning in Education

Managing Asthma with Mobile Phones: A Feasibility Study

Holtz, Bree, Whitten, Pamela·2009·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic disease and a growing health problem worldwide. The objective of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and utilization of tracking asthma symptoms through an innovative mobile phone application. The subjects for this research project consisted of 4 individuals who are currently receiving treatment for asthma from a primary care physician in Ingham County, Michigan. Participants took their peak flow reading each day and used the short message service (SMS) function on their phone and sent it to a Web server. If they did not send it by 11 AM, they received a reminder via an automated SMS to their phone. The resulting data suggest that this method of management is feasible. The data also demonstrate participants' satisfaction in monitoring their asthma in this manner. Using mobile phones for asthma management could improve compliance with asthma action plans and reduce adverse asthma events. Future research could further demonstrate that mobile phones are a new and effective method for providing healthcare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2009.0048

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As a result, the review did not report on recent mobile intervention development from proof-of-concept, usability/feasibility, or ongoing research reports.

    “As a result, we did not report on recent mobile intervention development from proof-of-concept (e.g., [82]), usability/feasibility (e.g., [83]), or ongoing research reports (e.g., [84])”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holtz, B., & Whitten, P.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2009-11
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
907-909
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2109204491
Cited by
78
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
asthma management, mobile application, peak expiratory flow monitoring, short message service, asthma action plan, medication adherence, patient satisfaction, remote patient monitoring, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Asthma, Communication, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Michigan, Patient Compliance, Patient Participation, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reminder Systems, Telemedicine, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review