Cited by 172Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Hypertension management using mobile technology and home blood pressure monitoring: results of a randomized trial in two low/middle-income countries

Open access
Piette, John D., Datwani, Hema, Gaudioso, Sofia, Foster, Stephanie M., Westphal, Joslyn, Perry, William, Rodríguez-Saldaña, Joel, Mendoza-Avelares, Milton O. +1 more·2012·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Objective: Hypertension and other noncommunicable diseases represent a growing threat to low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Mobile health technologies may improve noncommunicable disease outcomes, but LMICs lack resources to provide these services. We evaluated the efficacy of a cloud computing model using automated self-management calls plus home blood pressure (BP) monitoring as a strategy for improving systolic BPs (SBPs) and other outcomes of hypertensive patients in two LMICs. Subjects and Methods: This was a randomized trial with a 6-week follow-up. Participants with high SBPs (≥140 mm Hg if nondiabetic and ≥130 mm Hg if diabetic) were enrolled from clinics in Honduras and Mexico. Intervention patients received weekly automated monitoring and behavior change telephone calls sent from a server in the United States, plus a home BP monitor. At baseline, control patients received BP results, hypertension information, and usual healthcare. The primary outcome, SBP, was examined for all patients in addition to a preplanned subgroup with low literacy or high hypertension information needs. Secondary outcomes included perceived health status and medication-related problems. Results: Of the 200 patients recruited, 181 (90%) completed follow-up, and 117 of 181 had low literacy or high hypertension information needs. The median annual income was $2,900 USD, and average educational attainment was 6.5 years. At follow-up intervention patients' SBPs decreased 4.2 mm Hg relative to controls (95% confidence interval −9.1, 0.7; p =0.09). In the subgroup with high information needs, intervention patients' average SBPs decreased 8.8 mm Hg (−14.2, −3.4, p =0.002). Compared with controls, intervention patients at follow-up reported fewer depressive symptoms ( p =0.004), fewer medication problems ( p <0.0001), better general health ( p <0.0001), and greater satisfaction with care ( p ≤0.004). Conclusions: Automated telephone care management plus home BP monitors can improve outcomes for hypertensive patients in LMICs. A cloud computing model within regional telecommunication centers could make these services available in areas with limited infrastructure for patient-focused informatics support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2011.0271

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piette, J. D., Datwani, H., Gaudioso, S., Foster, S. M., Westphal, J., Perry, W., Rodríguez-Saldaña, J., Mendoza-Avelares, M. O., & Marinec, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Remedi Medical Research and Development
  • Yojoa Community Health Systems
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Piette, John D.
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2012-10
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
613-620
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2038461406
Cited by
172
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
antihypertensive therapy, home blood pressure monitoring, mobile health, cloud computing, low-middle income countries, systolic blood pressure, health literacy, drug-related problems, depressive symptoms, patient satisfaction, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases, Computer Simulation, Developing Countries, Female, Honduras, Humans, Hypertension, Income, Male, Mexico, Middle Aged, Poverty, Psychometrics, Socioeconomic Factors, Confidence Intervals, Telemedicine, Patient Selection, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review