Cited by 24Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCardiac Health and Mental Health

Effectiveness of telemedicine for cardiovascular disease management: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Han, Xiuping, Chen, Wenyu, Gao, Zihao, Lv, Xiaodong, Sun, Yanbao, Yang, Xiangdong, Shan, Huafeng·2021·Annals of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the development of information communication technology (ICT), telemedicine has become a promising option for patients with chronic diseases who need continuous monitoring at home or in remote health care facilities. As cardiovascular disease (CVD) is responsible for an estimated 17.9 million deaths globally each year, it is appropriate to evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine for the health care management of CVD patients. METHODS: The Library of Congress, LISTA (EBSCO), PubMed (NLM), and Web of Science databases were searched with a date limitation from 1 January 2000 until 5 August 2021 for Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) studies. Two independent researchers screened the records for inclusion and extracted the data for synthesis, supported by RevMan 5.0 software. As one of the clinical outcomes, the mean difference and standard deviation of systolic blood pressure were synthesized. For the Quality-of-life measures, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) scores were also synthesized and for the depression level, CESD-10 scores were synthesized. RESULTS: We identified 23 studies for qualitative analysis and 21 studies for quantitative analysis. 21 studies included systolic blood pressure as an outcome measure and the results show a statistical difference (P<0.05) between the intervention group and the control group and a favorable inclination toward the Telemedicine enhanced health care program over the usual care. Of the six studies that included body mass index (BMI) as an outcome measure, there was no significant difference in BMI between the telemedicine and usual health care groups. A total of five studies assessed patients' quality of life using the EQ-5D instrument. After excluding one study following the sensitivity analysis, telemedicine was shown to significantly improve patients' quality of life. Three studies that investigated patients' mental health (CSE-D-10) also showed a significantly beneficial effect of telemedicine over usual health care. DISCUSSION: This review found limited evidence to support some of the outcomes in the original study designs. Overall, our findings suggested a favorable effect of telemedicine intervention in the field of health care for CVD patients. Due to the unavoidable heterogeneity within the selected literature, a more detailed investigation and analysis of the unclear outcomes is recommended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/apm-21-3626

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of agreement of this result with previous related studies may be because the patients' enrollment criterion was T2DM and most interventions focused on reducing HbA1c with much less attention on BMI, LDL-cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, resulting in poor intervention effects.

    “This result did not agree with those of previous related studies,43 44 probably because the patients’ enrollment criterion was T2DM and most of the interventions focused on reducing HbA1c with much less attention on BMI, LDL-cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, thereby resulting in poor intervention effects.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Clark HD, Wells GA, Huët C, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale. Control Clin Trials 1999;20:448-52.
  2. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Sullivan L, et al. Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1867-72.
  3. Bobrow K, Farmer AJ, Springer D, et al. Mobile Phone Text Messages to Support Treatment Adherence in Adults With High Blood Pressure (SMS-Text Adherence Support StAR): A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial. Circulation 2016;133:592-600.
  4. Green BB, Cook AJ, Ralston JD, et al. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;299:2857-67.
  5. © Annals of Palliative Medicine. All rights reserved. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10(12):12831-12844 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-3626
  6. Kaihara T, Eguchi K, Kario K. Home BP monitoring using a telemonitoring system is effective for controlling BP in a remote island in Japan. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2014;16:814-9.
  7. Zheng X, Spatz ES, Bai X, et al. Effect of Text Messaging on Risk Factor Management in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: The CHAT Randomized Clinical Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2019;12:e005616.
  8. Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R. EQ-5D concepts and method. A Developmental History. Dordrecht: Springer 2005.
  9. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;10:ED000142. (English Language Editor: D. Fitzgerald) Cite this article as: Han X, Chen W, Gao Z, Lv X, Sun Y, Yang X, Shan H. Effectiveness of telemedicine for cardiovascular disease management: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10(12):12831-12844. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3626

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, X., Chen, W., Gao, Z., Lv, X., Sun, Y., Yang, X., & Shan, H.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Jiaxing University (CN)
  • Kanagawa University (JP)
Corresponding author
Shan, Huafeng
Venue
Annals of Palliative Medicine
Published
2021-12
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
12831-12844
ISSN
  • 2224-5820 (ISSN-L)
  • 2224-5839
OpenAlex
W4206522372
Cited by
24
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Annals of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
telemedicine, cardiovascular disease, remote patient monitoring, systolic blood pressure, quality of life, depression, body mass index, chronic disease management, home care
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Mental Health, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review