Cited by 119Technology Use by Older AdultsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Remote Health Monitoring for Older Adults and Those with Heart Failure: Adherence and System Usability

Open access
Evans, Jarrett, Papadopoulos, Amy, Silvers, Christine Tsien, Charness, Neil, Boot, Walter R., Schlachta-Fairchild, Loretta, Crump, Cindy, Martinez, Michele +1 more·2016·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Background: Remote health monitoring technology has been suggested as part of an early intervention and prevention care model. Older adults with a chronic health condition have been shown to benefit from remote monitoring but often have challenges with complex technology. The current study reports on the usability of and adherence with an integrated, real-time monitoring system over an extended period of time by older adults with and without a chronic health condition. Materials and Methods: Older adults 55 years of age and over with and without heart failure participated in a study in which a telehealth system was used for 6 months each. The system consisted of a wireless wristwatch-based monitoring device that continuously collected temperature and motion data. Other health information was collected daily using a weight scale, blood pressure cuff, and tablet that participants used for health surveys. Data were automatically analyzed and summarized by the system and presented to study nurses. Results: Forty-one older adults participated. Seventy-one percent of surveys, 75% of blood pressure readings, and 81% of daily weight measurements were taken. Participants wore the watch monitor 77% of the overall 24/7 time requested. The weight scale had the highest usability rating in both groups. The groups did not otherwise differ on device usage. Conclusions: The findings indicate that a health monitoring system designed for older adults can and will be used for an extended period of time and may help older adults with chronic conditions reside longer in their own homes in partnership with the healthcare system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2015.0140

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, LeRoy L, Ricciardi R, Miller T, Basu J. Multiple chronic conditions chartbook. AHRQ Publications Number Q14-0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  2. [15]Evans J, Papadopoulos A, Charness N, Tsien Silvers C, Boot WR, Schlachta-Fairchild L. Patient adherence and usability of a telehealth system for real-time automated hovering in an older adult sample [abstract]. Telemed J E Health 2014;20(5):A135–A136 [Google Scholar]
  3. [16]Evans J, Tsein Silvers C, Papadopoulos A, Charness N, Boot WR, Schlachta-Fairchild L, et al. Reliability, usability, and patient adherence with a real-time automated hovering telehealth system in older adults with chronic health conditions [abstract]. Telemed J E Health 2015;21(5):A126–A127 [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, J., Papadopoulos, A., Silvers, C. T., Charness, N., Boot, W. R., Schlachta-Fairchild, L., Crump, C., Martinez, M., & Ent, C. B.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • AFrame Digital (United States) (US)
  • AFrame Digital, Inc.
  • iTelehealth Inc.
  • Florida State University
Corresponding author
Charness, Neil
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2016-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
480-488
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2112469494
Cited by
119
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, older adults, heart failure, telemedicine, technology adherence, system usability, wearable devices, chronic disease, home care, weight monitoring, blood pressure monitoring, temperature monitoring, early intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Chronic Disease, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Telemedicine, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Computers, Handheld, Remote Sensing Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review