Cited by 31Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Canine Dirofilaria Infections in Two Uninvestigated Areas of Serbia: Epidemiological and Genetic Aspects

Open access
Tasić, Aleksandar, Tasić-Otašević, Suzana, Gabrielli, Simona, Miladinović-Tasić, Nataša, Ignjatović, Aleksandra, Đorđević, Jovana, Dimitrijević, Sanda, Cancrini, Gabriella·2012·Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases

Abstract

In 2009 canine filarial infections were investigated in two northern areas of Serbia (Pančevo and Veliko Gradište), applying morphometry, biochemical staining, and immunological kit to detect Dirofilaria immitis antigens, and two home-made ELISAs to detect antibodies to D. repens and D. immitis somatic/metabolic polyproteins. Moreover, molecular tools were applied to analyze the phylogenetic relationships of the isolates. The microfilariae detected in 21/122 dogs (17.2%) were identified as D. repens (n=21) and D. immitis (n=2). D. immitis antigens were found in another 13 animals with occult infection. All of the 15 heartworm-positive dogs also had antibodies to this parasite, which were detected in another 13 subjects, indicating an overall D. immitis seroprevalence rate of 22.9%. Serology for D. repens revealed evidence of antibodies in 42.6% of the dogs, but was negative for 4 microfilaremic dogs. As for the two different areas, the prevalence of microfilariae and/or D. immitis antigens, mainly due to D. repens microfilaremic animals, was not significantly higher in Veliko Gradište (33.3%) than in Pančevo (22%). However, serology showed a different epidemiological picture. Heartworm infection occurred more often in both areas, and antibodies to dirofilarial nematodes were detected in 72.9% of dogs living in Pančevo, a rate higher than in those living in Veliko Gradište (57.1%). No risk factors for infection were found, confirming the uselessness of prophylactic drugs against D. repens, and suggesting the presence in these areas of sunrise- or sunset-biting mosquitoes as important vectors. The results indicate the need for both appropriate entomological studies and further research on the intra-species variability shown by D. repens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/vbz.2011.0949

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epidemiological studies from Serbia have shown increased canine heartworm prevalence, with ranges between 12.7 and 33.3% in the north, together with presence of some microfilaremic dogs.

    “However, epidemiological studies from Serbia have shown increased prevalence, with ranges between 12.7 and 33.3% in the north of the country, together with the presence of some microfilaremic dogs [7,68,69,70,71].”
  • In another study conducted in 2009 in the northeastern part of Serbia, D. repens microfilariae were detected in 21 out of 122 (17.2%) pet dogs examined.

    “In another study conducted in 2009 in the northeastern part of the country, D. repens microfilariae were detected in 21 out of 122 (17.2%) pet dogs examined (Tasić et al., 2012).”
  • In some similar studies, no risk factors for filarial infection could be identified.

    “However, in some similar studies, no risk factors for filarial infection could be identified [26, 37].”

    From Dirofilaria infections in dogs in different areas of Greece (2016) · cites this paper as [37]

  • In two regions of Vojvodina (Pancevo and Veliko Gradiste), previously reported seroprevalence was 22.9% for D. immitis and presence of D. repens microfilariae was 39.34%.

    “In two regions of Vojvodina (Pancevo and Veliko Gradiste), the previously reported seroprevalence was 22.9% for D. immitis and the presence of D. repens microfilariae was 39.34% (38).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cancrini G. Della Torre A. Coluzzi M. Different probabilities of transmission of Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens by Culex pipiens. Proc VIth EMOP. 1992:90. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cancrini G. Gabrielli S. Vectors of Dirofilaria nematodes: biology, behaviour and host/parasite relationships. In: Genchi C, editor; Rinaldi L, editor; Cringoli G, editor. Mappe Parassitologiche. Vol. 8. 2007. pp. 47–58. [Google Scholar]
  3. Casiraghi M. Bazzocchi C. Sacchi L, et al. The Wolbachia endosymbionts of Dirofilaria immitis. In: Simon F, editor; Genchi C, editor. Heartworm Infection in Humans and Animals. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad Salamanca; 2001. pp. 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chalifoux L. Hunt RD. Histochemical differentiation of D. immitis and D. reconditum. JAVMA. 1971;158:601–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marcos-Atxutegi C. Gabrielli S. Kramer LH, et al. Antibody response against Dirofilaria immitis antigens and the Wolbachia endosymbiont in naturally infected canine and human hosts. Parassitologia. 2004;46(Suppl):116. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tasić, A., Tasić-Otašević, S., Gabrielli, S., Miladinović-Tasić, N., Ignjatović, A., Đorđević, J., Dimitrijević, S., & Cancrini, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Nis (RS)
  • Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nis, Faculty of Medicine, Nis, Serbia.
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
Corresponding author
Cancrini, Gabriella
Venue
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Published
2012-12
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
1031-1035
ISSN
  • 1530-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7759
OpenAlex
W2018473121
Cited by
31
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Veterinar – Repository of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
canine filariasis, Dirofilaria repens, Dirofilaria immitis, heartworm infection, dogs, seroprevalence, microfilariae, occult infection, phylogenetic analysis, mosquito vectors, Pančevo, Serbia
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Helminth, Antigens, Helminth, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Humans, Male, Microfilariae, Phylogeny, Zoonoses, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Helminth, Serbia, Dirofilaria repens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review