Cited by 24Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentResearch on Leishmaniasis StudiesHelminth infection and control

Seroreactivity to Dirofilariaantigens in people from different areas of Serbia

Open access
Tasić-Otašević, Suzana A, Gabrielli, Simona V, Tasić, Aleksandar V, MiladinovićTasić, Nataša L, Kostić, Jovana T, Ignjatović, Aleksandra M, Popović Dragonjić, Lidija D, Milošević, Zoran G +2 more·2014·BMC Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Northern part of Serbia is hyperendemic-endemic for canine dirofilarioses. Considering this fact, many human dirofilarial infections could be expected, however only about 30 cases in Serbia have been described until today. Aims of this survey were to assess the people reactivity to the antigens of D. repens and D. immitis and to identify risk factors for the contact exposure. METHODS: Investigation included sera taken from 297 people (179 women and 118 men) living in different areas of Serbia (Pančevo, Novi Sad, Zaječar, Leskovac, Vranje, Niš, Pirot). Sera were analysed by means of two indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) home-designed that use as antigens adult somatic/metabolic polyproteins of D. repens (DR) and D. immitis (DI), respectively. The results were elaborated using the statistical method of descriptive and quantitative analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences by area in the reactivity of human sera to dirofilarial antigens were not observed (p = 0.056). A high seroreactivity was demonstrated in people from the towns of northern Serbia (Pančevo = 27,1%; Novi Sad = 16,3%), as well as in people from Zaječar (eastern Serbia = 15,8%) and Vranje (southern Serbia = 15,1%). No differences were evidenced between people reactivity to polyproteins of the two dirofilarial species, nor differences related to the gender of examinees. Factor risks evidenced were: i) place of residence; ii) spending work time outdoors during the mosquito season; iii) spending time outdoors and nearby rivers, lakes, swamps or canals; unespectedly, iv) cat owning. CONCLUSION: The findings emerging from this investigation indicate that clinicians and public health authorities should pay greater attention to this zoonosis. Continuing education and training of physicians will greatly contribute to the knowledge of the actual impact of filarial worms on animal and public health, and allow for the planning of suitable measures to prevent the infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2334-14-68

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same study points out that the highest seroreactivity is recorded in the northeastern part of Serbia (Pančevo, 27.1%) close to sites where D. repens was found in wild animals in this study.

    “The same study points out that the highest seroreactivity is recorded in the northeastern part of the country (Pančevo, 27.1%) close to sites where D. repens was found in wild animals in this study.”

    From First records of Dirofilaria repens in wild canids from the region of Central Balkan (2014) · cites this paper as Tasić-Otašević et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tasić-Otašević, S. A., Gabrielli, S. V., Tasić, A. V., MiladinovićTasić, N. L., Kostić, J. T., Ignjatović, A. M., Popović Dragonjić, L. D., Milošević, Z. G., Arsić-Arsenijević, V. S., & Cancrini, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Nis (RS)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
Venue
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2014-02-08
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
68-68
ISSN
1471-2334 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018955689
Cited by
24
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
Dirofilaria repens, Dirofilaria immitis, seroprevalence, zoonoses, risk factors, outdoor exposure, cat ownership, northern Serbia, canine dirofilariasis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Antibodies, Helminth, Antigens, Helminth, Cats, Child, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dogs, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Zoonoses, Serbia, Young Adult, Dirofilaria repens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review