Cited by 22Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksWound Healing and TreatmentsGene Regulatory Network Analysis

A Network Approach to Wound Healing

Open access
Arodz, Tomasz, Bonchev, Danail, Diegelmann, Robert F.·2013·Advances in Wound Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The wound healing process is well-understood on the cellular and tissue level; however, its complex molecular mechanisms are not yet uncovered in their entirety. Viewing wounds as perturbed molecular networks provides the tools for analyzing and optimizing the healing process. It helps to answer specific questions that lead to better understanding of the complexity of the process. What are the molecular pathways involved in wound healing? How do these pathways interact with each other during the different stages of wound healing? Is it possible to grasp the entire mechanism of regulatory interactions in the healing of a wound? APPROACH: Networks are structures composed of nodes connected by links. A network describing the state of a cell taking part in the healing process may contain nodes representing genes, proteins, microRNAs, metabolites, and drug molecules. The links connecting nodes represent interactions such as binding, regulation, co-expression, chemical reaction, and others. Both nodes and links can be weighted by numbers related to molecular concentration and the intensity of intermolecular interactions. Proceeding from data and from molecular profiling experiments, different types of networks are built to characterize the stages of the healing process. Network nodes having a higher degree of connectivity and centrality usually play more important roles for the functioning of the system they describe. RESULTS: We describe here the algorithms and software packages for building, manipulating and analyzing networks proceeding from information available from a literature or database search or directly extracted from experimental gene expression, metabolic, and proteomic data. Network analysis identifies genes/proteins most differentiated during the healing process, and their organization in functional pathways or modules, and their distribution into gene ontology categories of biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular localization. We provide an example of how network analysis can be used to reach better understanding of regulation of key wound healing mediators and microRNAs that regulate them. INNOVATION: Univariate statistical tests widely used in clinical studies are not enough to improve understanding and optimize the processes of wound healing. Network methods of analysis of patients "omics" data, such as transcriptoms, proteomes, and others can provide a better insight into the healing processes and help in development of better treatment practices. We review several articles that are examples of this emergent approach to the study of wound healing. CONCLUSION: Network analysis has the potential to considerably contribute to the better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of wound healing and to the discovery of means to control and optimize that process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/wound.2012.0386

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment of rats, mice, and pigs with GHK effectively activates systemic healing throughout the animal.

    “The treatment of rats, mice, and pigs with GHK was shown to effectively activate systemic healing throughout the animal.”

    From GHK and DNA: Resetting the human genome to health (2014) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Hood L. Presentation on the First Summit on Systems Biology. Virginia Commonwealth University; May, 2007. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arodz, T., Bonchev, D., & Diegelmann, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Advances in Wound Care
Published
2013-11
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
499-509
ISSN
  • 2162-1918 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-1934
OpenAlex
W1992746127
Cited by
22
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Wound Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
wound healing, molecular networks, gene regulatory networks, microRNA, network analysis algorithms, gene expression profiling, proteomics, metabolomics, network centrality, Gene Ontology, functional modules, multi-omics integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review