Cited by 28Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsAgricultural and Food Production Studies

Contrasting approaches to projecting long-run global food security

Godfray, H. C. J., Robinson, S.·2015·Oxford Review of Economic Policy

Abstract

The provision of food has been a central preoccupation of policy-makers throughout history. Today we are witnessing a period of food security pessimism triggered by increases in food prices, and their higher volatility, that began in 2008. However, previous episodes of food pessimism were ended by the Industrial and Green Revolutions, and policy-makers legitimately ask whether human ingenuity and technical advances will address today’s worries without the need for their intervention. Here we explore some of the ways natural and social scientists have attempted to explore the supply and demand for food in the future to help policy-makers understand the challenges ahead. We are particularly struck that different communities have approached this problem in different ways that seldom reference each other. We describe two broad approaches: statistical extrapolation and economic simulation models of the food system that incorporate market mechanisms. We compare the strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches and make some tentative suggestions about how they can together address important policy priorities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxrep/grv006

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godfray, H. C. J., & Robinson, S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Godfray, H. C. J.
Venue
Oxford Review of Economic Policy
Published
2015-03-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
26-44
ISSN
  • 0266-903X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2121
OpenAlex
W2269561008
Cited by
28
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford Review of Economic Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/M021386/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
global food security, food price volatility, statistical extrapolation, market mechanisms, Industrial Revolution, Green Revolution, food policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review