Cited by 149Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

The debate over sustainable intensification

Godfray, H. Charles J.·2015·Food Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12571-015-0424-2

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godfray, H. C. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Godfray, H. Charles J.
Venue
Food Security
Published
2015-03-19
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
199-208
ISSN
  • 1876-4517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-4525
OpenAlex
W2079982797
Cited by
149
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
37.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Security (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/M021386/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
sustainable intensification, agricultural intensification, high-input agriculture, high-tech agriculture, environmental impact of agriculture, agricultural yields, stakeholder debate, food system sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review