Cited by 196Behavioral Health and InterventionsCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Predicting Social Distancing Intention and Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Social Cognition Model

Open access
Hagger, Martin S, Smith, Stephanie R, Keech, Jacob J, Moyers, Susette A, Hamilton, Kyra·2020·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Social distancing is a key behavior to minimize COVID-19 infections. Identification of potentially modifiable determinants of social distancing behavior may provide essential evidence to inform social distancing behavioral interventions. Purpose: The current study applied an integrated social cognition model to identify the determinants of social distancing behavior, and the processes involved, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In a prospective correlational survey study, samples of Australian (N = 365) and U.S. (N = 440) residents completed online self-report measures of social cognition constructs (attitude, subjective norm, moral norm, anticipated regret, and perceived behavioral control [PBC]), intention, action planning, habit, and past behavior with respect to social distancing behavior at an initial occasion. Follow-up measures of habit and social distancing behavior were taken 1 week later. Results: Structural equation models indicated that subjective norm, moral norm, and PBC were consistent predictors of intention in both samples. Intention, action planning, and habit at follow-up were consistent predictors of social distancing behavior in both samples. Action planning did not have consistent effects mediating or moderating the intention–behavior relationship. Inclusion of past behavior in the model attenuated effects among constructs, although the effects of the determinants of intention and behavior remained. Conclusions: Current findings highlight the importance of subjective norm, moral obligation, and PBC as determinants of social distancing intention and intention and habit as behavioral determinants. Future research on long-range predictors of social distancing behavior and reciprocal effects in the integrated model is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/abm/kaaa073

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a dearth of evidence exploring environmental restructuring in the context of social distancing, which raises an important gap in the pandemic behaviour change literature.

    “Despite the speculated benefits of environmental restructuring, there is a dearth of evidence exploring this intervention function in the context of social distancing [35, 36] which raises an important gap in the pandemic behaviour change literature.”
  • Hagger and colleagues suggest that the physical restructuring of spaces in a way that provides scaffolding on to how to enact social distancing, alongside consistent cues and reminders, can support social distancing behaviour and may eventually lead to habit-formation.

    “However Hagger and colleagues [35] suggest that the physical restructuring of spaces in a way that provides scaffolding on to how to enact social distancing, alongside consistent cues and reminders, can support social distancing behaviour and may eventually lead to habit-formation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Kickbusch I, Leung GM, Bhutta ZA, Matsoso MP, Ihekweazu C, Abbasi K. Covid-19: How a virus is turning the world upside down. BMJ. 2020;369:m1336.
  2. Ioannidis JA, Axfors C. Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG: Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters. Environ Res. 2020;188:109890.
  3. Clark A, Jit M, Warren-Gash C, et al.; Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group. Global, regional, and national estimates of the population at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to underlying health conditions in 2020: A modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e1003-e1017.
  4. Gostin LO, Wiley LF. Governmental public health powers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stay-at-home orders, business closures, and travel restrictions. JAMA. 2020;323:2137-2138.
  5. Islam N, Sharp SJ, Chowell G, et al. Physical distancing inter- ventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019: Natural experiment in 149 countries. BMJ. 2020;370:m2743.
  6. Lewnard JA, Lo NC. Scientific and ethical basis for social- distancing interventions against COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:631-633.
  7. Bonell C, Michie S, Reicher S, et al. Harnessing behav- ioural science in public health campaigns to maintain "social distancing" in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Key prin- ciples. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2020;74:617-619.
  8. Zhang CQ, Chung PK, Liu JD, Chan DKC, Hagger MS, Hamilton K. Health beliefs of wearing facemasks for influ- enza A/H1N1 prevention: A qualitative investigation of Hong Kong older adults. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2019;31:246-256.
  9. Williams L, Rasmussen S, Kleczkowski A, Maharaj S, Cairns N. Protection motivation theory and social distancing behaviour in response to a simulated infectious disease epi- demic. Psychol Health Med. 2015;20:832-837.
  10. Hagger MS, Cameron LD, Hamilton K, Hankonen N, Lintunen T, eds. The Handbook of Behavior Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2020. doi:10.1017/9781108677318 · DOI
  11. McEachan RRC, Conner MT, Taylor N, Lawton RJ. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2011;5:97-144.
  12. Conner MT, Norman P. Predicting and Changing Health Behaviour: Research and Practice With Social Cognition Models. 3rd ed. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press; 2015.
  13. Rivis A, Sheeran P, Armitage CJ. Expanding the affective and normative components of the Theory of Planned Behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;39:2985-3019.
  14. Heckhausen H, Gollwitzer PM. Thought contents and cogni- tive functioning in motivational and volitional states of mind. Motiv Emot. 1987;11:101-120.
  15. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behaviour change: How to pre- dict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health be- haviors. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:1-29.
  16. Zhang CQ, Zhang R, Schwarzer R, Hagger MS. A meta- analysis of the health action process approach. Health Psychol. 2019;38:623-637.
  17. Bélanger-Gravel A, Godin G, Amireault S. A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity. Health Psychol Rev. 2013;7:23-54.
  18. Conner MT, Warren R, Close S, Sparks P. Alcohol consump- tion and the theory of planned behavior: An examination of the cognitive mediation of past behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999;29:1676-1704.
  19. Wood W. Habit in personality and social psychology. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017;21:389-403.
  20. Orbell S, Verplanken B. The automatic component of habit in health behavior: Habit as cue-contingent automaticity. Health Psychol. 2010;29:374-383.
  21. van Bree RJH, van Stralen MM, Mudde AN, et al. Habit as mediator of the relationship between prior and later physical activity: A longitudinal study in older adults. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2015;19:95-102.
  22. Bourassa KJ, Sbarra DA, Caspi A, Moffitt TE. Social distancing as a health behavior: County-level movement in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic is asso- ciated with conventional health behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2020;54:548-556.
  23. Abraham C, Sheeran P. Acting on intentions: The role of an- ticipated regret. Br J Soc Psychol. 2003;42:495-511.
  24. Gardner B, Abraham C, Lally P, de Bruijn GJ. Towards parsi- mony in habit measurement: Testing the convergent and pre- dictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:102.
  25. Polet JJ, Schneider J, Hassandra M, et al. Predictors of school students' leisure-time physical activity: An extended trans- contextual model using Bayesian path analysis. Res Square. 2020. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-23231/v2 · DOI
  26. Conner M, Godin G, Sheeran P, Germain M. Some feel- ings are more important: Cognitive attitudes, affective atti- tudes, anticipated affect, and blood donation. Health Psychol. 2013;32:264-272.
  27. Cooke R, Sheeran P. Moderation of cognition-intention and cognition-behaviour relations: A meta-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 2004;43:159-186.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagger, M. S., Smith, S. R., Keech, J. J., Moyers, S. A., & Hamilton, K.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
Hagger, Martin S
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
54
Issue
10
Pages
713-727
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W3085555732
Cited by
196
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 4
FWCI
30.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Business Finland (1801/31/2015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
social distancing, COVID-19 pandemic, social cognition, theory of planned behavior, moral obligation, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, anticipated regret, action planning, habit, intention-behavior relationship, past behavior, behavioral factors, behavioral interventions
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Models, Psychological, Pneumonia, Viral, Social Isolation, Coronavirus Infections, Intention, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review