Cited by 21COVID-19 Prevention and ImpactBehavioral Health and InterventionsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Sociodemographic, Cognitive, and Emotional Determinants of Two Health Behaviors during SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: An Online Study among French-Speaking Belgian Responders during the Spring Lockdown

Open access
Bigot, Alix, Banse, Emilie, Cordonnier, Aline, Luminet, Olivier·2021·Psychologica Belgica

Abstract

To contain the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate, health authorities have encouraged the population to enhance protective behaviors such as physical distancing and handwashing. Behavioral sciences emphasize the role of sociocognitive determinants to explain health behaviors, while largely ignoring emotional factors. In a large online study (N > 4000), we investigated the role of sociodemographic, cognitive, emotional, and social factors that can facilitate or hinder handwashing and limitation of social contacts. Data were collected from March 18 until April 19, 2020, which corresponds to the spring lockdown and the first peak of the pandemic in Belgium. Logistic regressions showed that sociodemographic factors (gender, age, level of education) and the dimensions of the Theory of Planned Behavior (intentions, attitudes, perceived behavioral control and subjective norms) had a strong impact on health behaviors, but that emotional factors explained an additional part of the variance. Being more attentive/determined and frightened/anxious, along with scoring higher on health anxiety were related to a higher frequency of handwashing. In contrast, being enthusiastic/happy was related to lower adherence to limiting social contacts. Our results suggest that the type of predictors and the direction of associations depend on the type of health behavior considered. The role of specific emotional factors in addition to more classical predictors is discussed. The study offers new perspectives regarding the factors that are associated with the adherence to behaviors recommended to adopt when faced with a pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/pb.712

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative emotions encourage people to respect barrier gestures.

    “Indeed, Bigot et al. (2021) [64] and Harper et al. (2020) [65] have shown that negative emotions encourage people to respect barrier gestures.”

    From At the Peak of the Second Wave of COVID-19, Did Millennials Show Different Emotional Responses from Older Adults? (2022) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Discussion section reports that higher fear and anxiety were associated with sufficient handwashing, supporting the claim for one negative-emotion category and one preventive behavior. It does not establish that negative emotions generally encourage adherence to barrier gestures, and it cautions that intense fear may decrease adherence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [13]Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2015). Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  2. [14]Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2015). The theory of planned behavior and the reasoned action approach. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting and changing health behaviour (2nd ed., 142– 188). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  3. [15]Croyle, R. T., Sun, Y. C., & Hart, M. (1997). Processing risk factor information: Defensive biases in health-related judgments and memory. In K. J. Petrie & J. Weinman (Eds.), Perceptions of Health & Illness (pp. 267– 290). The Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers.
  4. [31]Isen, A. M., Means, B., Patrick, R., & Nowichi, G. (1982). Some factors influencing decision-making strategy and risk-taking. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 243– 261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. [33]Johnstone, E. C. (Ed.). (2010). Companion to psychiatric studies (8th ed). Churchill Livingstone.
  6. [60]Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
  7. [61]Triandis, H. C. (Ed.). (1980). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Boston, USA: Allyn and Bacon.
  8. [73]World Health Organization. (2007). Addressing sex and gender in epidemic-prone infectious diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bigot, A., Banse, E., Cordonnier, A., & Luminet, O.
Affiliations
  • Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Luminet, Olivier
Venue
Psychologica Belgica
Published
2021
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
63-78
ISSN
  • 0033-2879 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-670X
OpenAlex
W3132235465
Cited by
21
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Psychologica Belgica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Psychologica Belgica (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, hand washing, social distancing, health behavior, theory of planned behavior, emotional factors, health anxiety, sociodemographic factors, cognitive factors, lockdown, French-speaking Belgium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review