The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Altruism in Humans
Abstract
This book takes a hard-science look at the possibility that we humans have the capacity to care for others for their sakes (altruism) rather than simply for our own (egoism). The look is based not on armchair speculation, dramatic cases, or after-the-fact interviews, but on an extensive series of theory-testing laboratory experiments conducted over the past 35 years. Part I details the theory of altruistic motivation that has been the focus of this experimental research. The theory centers on the empathy-altruism hypothesis, which claims that other-oriented feelings of sympathy and compassion for a person in need (empathic concern) produce motivation with the ultimate goal of having that need removed. Antecedents and consequences of empathy-induced altruistic motivation are specified, making the theory empirically testable. Part II offers a comprehensive summary of the research designed to test the empathy-altruism hypothesis, giving particular attention to recent challenges. Overall, the research provides remarkably strong and consistent support for this hypothesis, forcing a tentative conclusion that empathy-induced altruism is within the human repertoire. Part III considers the theoretical and practical implications of this conclusion, suggesting that empathy-induced altruism is a far more pervasive and powerful force in human affairs than has been recognized. Failure to appreciate its importance has handicapped attempts to understand why we humans act as we do and wherein…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research in social psychology suggests that extreme helping is shaped by moral identity, internalized norms, perceived responsibility, situational immediacy, and identification with others (35, 36).”
From Volunteerism as a multidimensional form of human prosocial engagement (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3085 · Cited by 1,231
Interpersonal emotion regulation.
Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0033839 · Cited by 988
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., Mathew, S., Newton, E. K., Naar, N., Newson, L., et al. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1400106x · Cited by 639
Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy
Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2012) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003 · Cited by 508
Decety, J., Chen, C., Harenski, C., & Kiehl, K. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00489 · Cited by 386
“with psychopathy: imagining another in pain does not evoke empathy”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Batson, C. D.
- Corresponding author
- Batson, C. Daniel
- ORCID
- Batson, C. Daniel
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2010-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2109004781
- Cited by
- 1,039
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 23.91
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- altruism, empathy-altruism hypothesis, empathic concern, egoism, prosocial motivation, compassion, interpersonal relationships, happiness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Altruism in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341065.001.0001
- The paper
- Batson, C. D. (2010). Altruism in Humans. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780195341065.001.0001